Off-Grid Fire Prevention Using AI Firebrand Trajectory Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fire prevention systems require extensive installation, large water storage, and indiscriminate spraying, leading to inefficiencies and scalability issues, with rooftop and mobile systems often failing to effectively extinguish fires due to resource exhaustion.

Innovation Solution

An AI-driven off-grid fire prevention system using area fire prevention units with directable nozzles, coupled to computing devices that detect and predict firebrand trajectories, allowing precise targeting and minimal resource discharge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rooftop systems discharge high density of water over the entirety of a home, then fire coverage is improved, but water storage requirements and system complexity increase massively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire coverageVSAvoidwater storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from uniform water distribution across the entire property to localized suppression at specific fire hazard points. Sensors detect firebrands and trigger sprinklers only at predicted impact locations, concentrating water resources where needed rather than spraying indiscriminately across the whole property.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary trajectory prediction of firebrands using sensor data and computational models before the firebrand actually impacts the property. This advance warning allows the system to pre-position water suppression at the exact location and time needed, avoiding both over-suppression and under-suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If rooftop systems are designed to the perfect square dimensions of every home, then fire protection coverage is optimized, but manufacturing time and installation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protection coverageVSAvoidsystem customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs modular, standardized components that can be deployed across different property configurations without custom manufacturing. The core architecture uses universal sensors, processors, and sprinkler units that adapt to various layouts through software configuration rather than physical customization, dramatically reducing lead times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, permanently installed rooftop systems to dynamic, mobile units that can be rapidly deployed and repositioned. The mobile architecture allows the system to adapt to different property shapes and sizes by reconfiguring unit positions rather than requiring custom manufacturing for each site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Area of stationary object

If mobile systems use large storage tanks of water, then coverage area is improved, but the water supply is still exhausted before complete extinguishment of the burning house

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidwater supply duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes continuous sensor monitoring and trajectory prediction operations that persist throughout the fire event, enabling ongoing suppression actions. Rather than relying on a finite stored water supply, the system maintains continuous detection and response, triggering water discharge at precise moments as firebrands approach, thereby extending effective coverage beyond the limitations of fixed storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time sensor feedback to continuously update firebrand trajectory predictions and adjust water discharge timing and location dynamically. This closed-loop control ensures water is delivered at the optimal moment to intercept firebrands, maximizing the effectiveness of each unit of water supplied and extending the operational duration of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If fire prevention systems spray water indiscriminately, then coverage is improved, but resource waste and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression capabilityVSAvoidwater waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces indiscriminate spraying with precision-targeted suppression. Sensors detect the exact location and trajectory of firebrands, and the system calculates optimal discharge points where water will intercept the firebrand. Water is discharged only at these specific locations, minimizing waste while maintaining effective suppression capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary trajectory calculation and impact prediction before water discharge occurs. By predicting where firebrands will land based on current sensor data and environmental conditions, the system pre-determines the exact discharge location and timing needed, ensuring water is applied only where and when necessary to intercept the firebrand, thereby eliminating wasteful indiscriminate spraying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250339715A1Ai-driven off-grid fire prevention system and method
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 VIGILLENT INC
  • US20250339715A1 patent drawing
  • US20250339715A1 patent drawing
  • US20250339715A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for protecting an area from fire having one or more area fire prevention units capable of discharging fire suppressant via a directable nozzle, each fire prevention unit being communicatively coupled to a computing device which detects airborne firebrands, predicts their trajectories and final landing positions, and directs one or of the fire prevention units to discharge fire suppressant toward the firebrand at its final landing position. Depending on configuration, the system may further use wind data, GPS, and terrain models to calculate the trajectory and final position of the firebrand. Also depending on configuration, the system may calculate a spread and distance of suppressant discharge, a nozzle aperture, and an amount of suppressant to discharge. Some embodiments may use trained machine learning algorithms to make one or more of the system's calculations.