Off-Road Vehicle Speed Limiting via Safety Belt Sensor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to incentivize drivers of open cockpit recreational utility vehicles (RUVs) to use their safety belts, as many drivers do not comply with safety belt mandates, posing a safety risk.

Innovation Solution

An off-road vehicle system that includes a safety belt sensor and switch connected to the control unit, which limits the vehicle's speed or torque when the driver's safety belt is not engaged, reducing the vehicle's performance to a predetermined level if the belt remains unfastened for a specified period.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle limits speed when safety belt is not engaged, then driver safety compliance is improved, but vehicle performance is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety belt complianceVSAvoidvehicle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts vehicle speed limits based on the safety belt engagement status. When the safety belt is not engaged, the control unit automatically reduces the maximum speed to a predetermined lower value. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making speed a variable parameter that adapts to safety conditions rather than maintaining a fixed value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a safety belt sensor to continuously monitor whether the driver has engaged the safety belt and provides feedback to the control unit. Based on this feedback, the control unit adjusts the speed limit accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that speed restrictions are automatically applied only when needed (when the belt is unengaged), thereby improving compliance without permanently degrading vehicle performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the vehicle limits torque when safety belt is not engaged, then driver safety compliance is improved, but vehicle power is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety belt complianceVSAvoidengine torque
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts engine torque output based on safety belt engagement status. When the sensor detects that the safety belt is not engaged, the control unit reduces the maximum torque to a predetermined lower value. This dynamic torque management resolves the contradiction by making power availability conditional on safety compliance rather than permanently reducing engine capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit receives continuous feedback from the safety belt sensor about engagement status and automatically adjusts torque limits in response. This feedback-driven torque management ensures that power restrictions are applied only when the safety belt is unengaged, improving compliance while preserving full power availability when the belt is properly worn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the system adds speed limiting functionality, then safety incentive is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety incentiveVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is designed to perform multiple functions: it manages normal engine operation, monitors safety belt status, enforces speed limits, and enforces torque limits. By making the control unit a multi-functional device, the system avoids adding separate dedicated controllers for each function, thereby improving safety incentives while minimizing the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the safety belt monitoring function with the existing engine control functions in a single integrated control unit. The safety belt sensor is integrated into the existing control architecture, and the speed/torque limiting logic is combined with normal engine management operations. This merging approach reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall control system while still providing comprehensive safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8464824B1Off-road wheeled vehicle speed limiting system
Publication Date: 2013.06.18 BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PROD INC
  • US8464824B1 patent drawing
  • US8464824B1 patent drawing
  • US8464824B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An open cockpit off-road vehicle has an engine, four wheels, side-by-side driver and passenger seats, and a driver safety belt which include a seat belt, first and second connecting portions selectively connected to each other, and one of a safety belt sensor and a safety belt switch sensing a state of this connection. A continuously variable transmission (CVT) operatively connects the engine to the wheels. A control unit is connected to the engine. A vehicle speed sensor senses a speed of rotation of a shaft driven by the CVT. The control unit controls the engine in a vehicle speed limit mode when the first and second connecting portions are disconnected. When in this mode, the control unit controls the engine to limit the speed of the vehicle to a predetermined speed and to permit the engine to reach a torque necessary to operate the vehicle at the predetermined speed.