Off-Zone Crash Detection Using Derived Yaw Acceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle safety systems are inadequate in detecting off-zone crashes, particularly impacts occurring in front of the A-pillar or behind the C-pillar, leading to inadequate responses during such incidents.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing at least two acceleration sensors positioned within a vehicle to detect translational accelerations, with an electronic processor deriving approximate yaw acceleration and comparing it to a threshold to initiate appropriate actions, such as deploying airbags or sending alerts, in response to off-zone crashes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional sensors are used to detect impacts, then the system is simple and easy to manufacture, but the system cannot detect off-zone impacts occurring in front of the A-pillar or behind the C-pillar

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoff-zone impact detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the vehicle into multiple impact zones (front, side, rear, and off-zone areas) and places acceleration sensors at specific locations (front, center, and rear of the vehicle body) to detect impacts in each zone. This segmentation allows the system to specifically detect off-zone impacts that conventional single-location sensors miss, while maintaining a manageable sensor count through strategic positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from detecting only linear acceleration to deriving and analyzing yaw acceleration (rotational acceleration around the vertical axis) from multiple sensor readings. By adding this rotational dimension to the detection capability, the system can distinguish off-zone impacts from conventional impacts based on their different rotational characteristics, significantly improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple acceleration sensors are positioned throughout the vehicle to detect off-zone impacts, then detection accuracy improves, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact location and type detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensors and processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions acceleration sensors at specific strategic locations (front, center, and rear of the vehicle body) rather than uniformly distributing them throughout. This localized positioning optimizes the detection of off-zone impacts while minimizing the total number of sensors required, balancing measurement precision with device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the need for numerous specialized sensors with a combination of fewer standard acceleration sensors and computational algorithms. By using the electronic processor to derive yaw acceleration from multiple linear acceleration readings, the system achieves high measurement precision without proportionally increasing hardware complexity or cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If conventional crash detection systems are used, then the system response is fast for conventional impacts, but the system fails to initiate proper safety actions for off-zone crashes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveappropriate safety response initiationVSAvoidoff-zone impact detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the electronic processor continuously monitors acceleration sensor readings, derives yaw acceleration, compares it against thresholds, and initiates appropriate safety responses. This closed-loop system ensures that off-zone impacts are detected and trigger proper safety actions, resolving the failure of conventional systems to respond appropriately to these specific impact types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from simple linear acceleration magnitude to derived yaw acceleration (rotational component). This parameter transformation enables the system to distinguish off-zone impacts from conventional impacts based on their different rotational characteristics, allowing reliable detection and appropriate response initiation for previously undetectable impact types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively detects off-zone crashes by accurately determining yaw acceleration, enabling timely and appropriate safety measures to be taken, thereby enhancing vehicle safety during lane changes, intersections, and other critical driving situations.

Implementation Method 1

at least two acceleration sensors positioned within a body of the vehicle... receive a first acceleration value at a centerline of the vehicle from a first acceleration sensor... receive a second acceleration value at the centerline of the vehicle from a second acceleration sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration sensing: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11648900B2Off-zone crash detection using lateral accelerations at different positions in a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11648900B2 patent drawing
  • US11648900B2 patent drawing
  • US11648900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detecting off-zone crashes involving a vehicle using lateral acceleration values detected at locations within the vehicle. In one example method, an electronic processor receives a first acceleration value at a centerline of the vehicle from a first acceleration sensor of at least two acceleration sensors. The electronic processor also receives a second acceleration value at the centerline of the vehicle from a second acceleration sensor of the at least two acceleration sensors. The method also includes deriving, with the electronic processor, an approximate yaw acceleration at the centerline of the vehicle based on the first acceleration value and the second acceleration value. The method also includes comparing, with the electronic processor, the approximate yaw acceleration to a threshold and initiating, with the electronic processor, one or more actions in response to the yaw acceleration exceeding the threshold.