Off-Center Parachute Flight Termination With Redundant Burn-Wire Latches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flight termination systems for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) lack redundancy and fail to provide a controlled and predictable descent in case of power loss or malfunction, leading to unpredictable landing scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A latching mechanism with dual burn wires and a redundant off-center parachute system, controlled by ground-based radio modules, ensures secure separation of the UAV door and deployment of an off-center parachute, inducing a controlled spiral descent.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single burn wire and single parachute system is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of flight termination is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight termination reliabilityVSAvoidlatching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching mechanism is divided into multiple independent latch units (first latch and second latch) that can be independently actuated by separate burn wires. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability through redundancy while keeping each individual latch component relatively simple in structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the UAV door are secured by different latches positioned at different locations. The first latch secures a first portion while the second latch secures a second portion, allowing localized failure without complete system failure and enabling targeted release of specific door sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If a centered parachute is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the stability of descent is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedescent stabilityVSAvoidparachute deployment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The parachute is deliberately positioned off-center within the UAV rather than at the center. This asymmetric placement creates a controlled moment arm that generates stabilizing torque during descent, causing the UAV to orient in a predictable manner and spiral down in a controlled fashion rather than tumbling unpredictably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If the door is securely latched during flight, then the reliability of flight operation is improved, but the ease of emergency release is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor security during flightVSAvoidemergency door release
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical release system is replaced with an electrical/thermal actuation system using burn wires. The burn wires can be remotely activated via radio frequency signals from ground control, allowing emergency release without requiring physical access to the latches or manual operation during critical flight situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The release function is extracted from the mechanical latch structure itself and implemented as a separate thermal cutting system. The burn wires are positioned to cut the retention strings that hold the latches engaged, separating the securing function from the release function and enabling independent control of each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a redundant and controlled descent mechanism, ensuring a predictable and stable landing of UAVs even in power loss situations, with the ability to manually override for safe landing.

Implementation Method 1

current from a backup battery passes to at least one burn wire of the at least two burn wires when the burn signal may be received, where the burn wire melts a portion of the string

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

deploying the parachute may cause a drag force on a first side of the UAV, where the drag force slows down the first side of the UAV more than a second opposite side of the UAV inducing a torque on the UAV which results in a rotation of the UAV

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag force: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS20250256869A1Off-Center Parachute Flight Termination System Including Latch Mechanism Disconnectable by Burn Wire
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 AEROVIRONMENT INC
  • US20250256869A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256869A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256869A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods including: a latching mechanism comprising: a first latch configured to attach to a door of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); a second latch configured to attach to a portion of the UAV distal from the first latch; a string connected between the first and second latch, where the string secures the door shut; at least two radio modules in communication with a ground control station; and at least two burn wires in contact with a portion of the string between the first latch and the second latch; where current from a backup battery passes to at least one burn wire when the burn signal is received, where the burn wire causes the connection between the first latch and the second latch to be broken and the door of the UAV is separated from the UAV.