Offline Control Learning With Feedback-Corrected State Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing learning methods for control targets using offline data face accuracy issues when insufficient data is available for certain states, leading to suboptimal control performance.

Innovation Solution

A learning device that utilizes a model acquisition means to train a policy using feedback information, a display device to evaluate accuracy, and a recording medium to improve model accuracy by incorporating user feedback and correcting pseudo trajectories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If offline learning is performed using data obtained in advance, then the control learning can be completed without real-time data collection, but the accuracy of learning in states with insufficient data will be low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol learning accuracyVSAvoiddata sufficiency in certain states
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the learned policy is executed in the actual environment, and the resulting state transitions are fed back as new training data. This allows the system to iteratively improve learning accuracy in states where initial data was insufficient, resolving the contradiction between offline learning efficiency and learning accuracy in data-scarce states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary offline learning with available data to obtain an initial policy, then uses this policy to generate additional training data through actual execution. This preliminary action enables the system to start with limited data and progressively improve, rather than requiring complete data upfront.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If more data is collected to improve learning accuracy in all states, then the learning accuracy improves, but the time and resources required for data collection increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by using its own learned policy to generate training data through actual execution in the environment. This eliminates the need for external data collection efforts, allowing the system to improve its own learning accuracy without additional time investment in data gathering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous improvement of learning accuracy by maintaining a loop where the policy is continuously executed and the results are continuously fed back for retraining. This continuous useful action allows incremental accuracy improvements without interrupting the operational workflow for data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If a complex model is used to handle states with limited data, then the learning accuracy in those states improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol learning accuracy in data-scarce statesVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic approach where the policy is continuously updated through iterative retraining with feedback data. Rather than using a statically complex model, the system maintains a relatively simple model structure that evolves and adapts over time through continuous learning from actual execution data, achieving high accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260024010A1Learning device, display device, learning method, display method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 NEC CORP
  • US20260024010A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024010A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024010A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A learning device includes: a model acquisition means that, through training using data that links a state of an environment where an agent performs an action, an action that is executable in the state, and a next state in a case where the action is performed in the state, acquires a model takes a state and an action as input and a next state as output; a feedback information acquisition means that, based on the acquired model, acquires feedback information that is information that is used for training the model or for training a new model that takes a state and an action as input and a next state as output; and a policy management means that trains a policy indicating an action of the agent according to a state by using the model acquired through training using the feedback information.