Offline Reinforcement Learning With Robust Reward Model Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reinforcement learning algorithms often require clear reward signals, which are subjective and imprecise in real-world scenarios, leading to unreliable agent behavior, and online reinforcement methods may not be feasible in environments where interaction is expensive, dangerous, or unavailable.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system that trains multiple reinforcement learning models on an offline dataset using diverse reward models and a robustness operator to generate a robust policy, leveraging offline datasets and imprecise reward signals to produce reliable behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reinforcement learning algorithms use traditional reward signals, then the learning process can proceed, but the policies produced are suboptimal due to unreliable and imprecise reward signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy reliabilityVSAvoidreward signal precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple diverse reward models into an ensemble that produces a single robust reward signal. By merging the predictions of multiple models through a robustness operator (such as tau-percentile aggregation), the system overcomes the imprecision of individual reward signals and generates more reliable policies for offline reinforcement learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a robustness operator as an intermediary component between the multiple reward models and the reinforcement learning algorithm. This operator aggregates the outputs of diverse reward models and filters out unreliable signals, providing a refined reward estimate that improves policy reliability without requiring direct interaction with the environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If interaction with the environment is used for data collection, then the reinforcement learning algorithm can learn from real feedback, but the process becomes expensive or dangerous in certain environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy robustnessVSAvoiddata collection cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by training multiple diverse reward models offline on available datasets before the actual reinforcement learning process. This preliminary training of reward models allows the system to evaluate policies without requiring extensive environment interaction, reducing the cost and risk of data collection while maintaining policy robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of reward evaluation through multiple diverse reward models instead of relying on single environment interactions. These model copies provide alternative perspectives on reward signals, enabling the system to learn robust policies from offline data without repeatedly interacting with the expensive or dangerous environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If a single reward model is used, then the system complexity is low, but the policy performance deteriorates due to unreliable reward signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward signal reliabilityVSAvoidreward model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the reward evaluation system by using multiple diverse models with different architectures, hyperparameters, or training configurations. By varying these parameters across multiple models and aggregating their outputs through a robustness operator, the system achieves more reliable reward signals while managing complexity through diverse but coordinated model ensembles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12619911B2Computing robust policies in offline reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12619911B2 patent drawing
  • US12619911B2 patent drawing
  • US12619911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a method, computer system, and computer program product for reinforcement learning is provided. The present invention may include training, using an offline dataset, a plurality of diverse reward models, and creating a policy based on an output of the reward models and a robustness operator of the reward models.