Offset Coil Layout for Permanent Magnet Motor Torque Ripple

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Synchronous motors with permanent magnet arrays, such as the yokeless and segmented armature motor (YASA), often experience significant torque ripple and torque cogging, leading to motor noise, wear, and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The use of offset and overlapping stator coils in an electric motor design with opposed magnet arrays, along with a slotted core ring and division of windings between the core ring sides, helps to reduce torque ripple and cogging while preserving high torque density and magnetic path lengths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If standard permanent magnet arrays are used in synchronous motors, then high torque density is achieved, but significant torque ripple and torque cogging occur causing motor noise and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque densityVSAvoidtorque ripple and cogging
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The stator coil assembly is segmented into two separate coil arrays (first and second coil arrays), each positioned on opposite sides of the permanent magnet arrays. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each coil array to reduce torque ripple and cogging while maintaining high torque density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two coil arrays are positioned asymmetrically with different angular offsets relative to the permanent magnet arrays. The first coil array has a first angular offset and the second coil array has a second angular offset, creating an asymmetric configuration that balances magnetic forces and reduces torque ripple and cogging effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-generated harmful factors

If magnets are skewed or offset to reduce torque ripple, then torque ripple and cogging are reduced, but magnetic path length increases and torque density decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque ripple and coggingVSAvoidmagnetic path length
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of skewing magnets in the axial direction (adding length), the solution introduces a new dimensional approach by positioning coil arrays on both sides of the permanent magnets with different angular offsets. This angular offsetting in the circumferential dimension achieves torque ripple reduction without extending the magnetic path length axially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If rotor displacement is used to reduce torque cogging, then cogging torque is reduced, but alignment precision and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecogging torqueVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The solution creates a mirrored configuration with two coil arrays positioned on opposite sides of the permanent magnet arrays. Each coil array is a copy of the other but with different angular offsets, allowing the system to achieve cogging reduction through the combined magnetic fields without requiring precise rotor displacement or complex manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively reduces torque ripple and cogging torque by up to 87% compared to similar motors, enhancing motor efficiency and reducing noise and wear, while maintaining high torque density and compatibility with standard magnet structures.

Implementation Method 1

a coil assembly (mounted for relative rotation with the permanent magnet assembly) positioned between the first magnet array and second magnet array, the coil assembly having a first coil array of circumferentially spaced coils facing the first magnet array and a second coil array of circumferentially spaced coils facing the second magnet array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a permanent magnet assembly having a first magnet array of circumferentially spaced permanent magnets in opposition to a second magnet array of circumferentially spaced permanent magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS20250079960A1Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Torque Ripple Reduction
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND
  • US20250079960A1 patent drawing
  • US20250079960A1 patent drawing
  • US20250079960A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric motor having opposed permanent magnet arrays employs overlapping offset coils positioned between the arrays to reduce torque ripple and cogging torque.