Offset Lug Backing Element for Drill Bit Cutter Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional drill bits experience premature wear and cutter loss due to high contact stresses and temperatures, leading to reduced service life and increased maintenance costs, as the backing elements used to support cutters are prone to erosion and fatigue failure.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a backing element with a forward face and a rearward offset lug that secures into the bit blade, distributing forces more efficiently and reducing stress concentration, along with a protrusion to limit cutter engagement depth and prevent stick-slip events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional backing elements are used to support cutters, then the cutters can be retained in the bit, but the backing elements are prone to erosion and fatigue failure due to high contact stresses and temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter retentionVSAvoidservice life of backing element
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The backing element is divided into a body portion and a separate rearward offset lug that extends into the blade. This segmentation allows the lug to be positioned optimally for stress distribution while the body supports the cutter, resolving the contradiction by enabling both reliable cutter retention and extended service life through separated functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lug is positioned offset from the rear face of the cutter body, extending rearward into the blade at a distance. This spatial repositioning in another dimension (rearward offset) allows forces to be distributed more effectively into the blade structure, reducing stress concentration on the backing element itself while maintaining secure cutter retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the cutter is not fully supported at the rear face, then the structure is simpler, but the forces generated during drilling can pull the cutter out of the cutter pocket

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacking element structureVSAvoidcutter retention force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of extending the backing element directly behind the cutter face, the lug is offset rearward into the blade, utilizing a different spatial dimension. This offset positioning provides effective force transmission and cutter retention while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and force transmission capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rearward offset lug acts as an intermediary element that transfers forces from the cutter-supporting body portion into the blade structure. This mediator approach enables effective force transmission and cutter retention without requiring the backing element itself to be complex or extensively embedded in the blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If raised backing features are added to support the rear face of the cutter, then cutter retention is improved, but these features are limited in strength and durability and can wear or erode away

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter supportVSAvoidbacking feature durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The backing element is segmented into a body portion for cutter support and a separate rearward offset lug for force distribution. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function, with the lug positioned to distribute stresses away from the supporting features, thereby improving both cutter support reliability and backing feature durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lug extends rearward from the body portion into the blade, positioning the force distribution mechanism in a different spatial dimension away from the cutter-supporting features. This dimensional separation protects the supporting features from excessive stress concentration, improving their durability and resistance to wear and erosion while maintaining reliable cutter support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10352103B2Cutter support element
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 ULTERRA DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES LP
  • US10352103B2 patent drawing
  • US10352103B2 patent drawing
  • US10352103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cutters mounted on bits for advancing boreholes are subject to extreme forces that can separate the cutter from the bit. A cutter backing element with a rearward extending lug and forward face can provide support to the cutter. The backing element is attached to the back face of the cutter and the lug of the backing element is received in a recess of the bit. The backing element can be brazed to the bit and the cutter. The lug is offset from a longitudinal axis of the backing element. Forces applied to the front of the cutter during drilling operations are transferred through the cutter to the backing element and to the bit through the offset lug.