Offset MIM Anti-Fuse Structure for Sub-Rule Interconnect Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As integrated circuits scale down, challenges arise in fabricating memory-based structures due to limitations in reducing the size of fuse structures, which are necessary for effective programming with high voltages.

Innovation Solution

The formation of offset anti-fuse elements within the interconnect region using metal-insulator-metal (MIM) structures, which are intentionally offset from contacting metal lines to reduce the active fuse area, allowing for sub-design rule fuse areas and higher fuse yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of moving object

If fuse structures are made smaller to enable scaling, then integration density improves, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to lithography limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuse areaVSAvoidlithography precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar fuse structures to three-dimensional MIM structures by adding vertical stacking of metal layers separated by an insulator. This dimensional change allows the fuse area to be reduced in the lateral plane while maintaining sufficient active area through vertical extension, thereby overcoming lithography resolution limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The MIM fuse structure embeds the insulator layer within stacked metal layers, creating a nested configuration where the insulator is positioned between two conductive plates. This nesting approach concentrates the fuse functionality within a compact vertical footprint, enabling smaller effective fuse areas that cannot be achieved through standard lithography alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Use of energy by moving object

If fuse area is reduced to lower programming voltage, then power consumption decreases, but reliability deteriorates due to insufficient active fuse area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming voltageVSAvoidfuse yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the fuse structure by transitioning from a planar configuration to a vertical MIM configuration. This parameter change allows the lateral fuse area to be reduced (lowering programming voltage) while the vertical dimension compensates by providing sufficient active area between the metal plates, thereby maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If standard lithography is used for fuse formation, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but area reduction below design rules cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidfuse area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the fuse structure with the interconnect layers by using the existing metal layers as the MIM fuse electrodes. This integration allows the fuse structure to be formed using the same lithography and deposition processes as the interconnect, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while achieving sub-design rule fuse areas through the vertical MIM configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250201698A1Offset via fuse structure in interconnect region
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 INTEL CORP
  • US20250201698A1 patent drawing
  • US20250201698A1 patent drawing
  • US20250201698A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for forming an offset anti-fuse device within the interconnect region over a plurality of field effect transistor (FET) devices. The anti-fuse device can be implemented as a MIM structure within a given interconnect layer. The MIM structure has a first electrode, a dielectric structure on the first electrode, and a second electrode on the dielectric structure. A lower metal line of the interconnect region makes contact with the first electrode and an upper metal line of the interconnect region makes contact with the second electrode. The MIM structure is offset from the upper and/or lower metal lines to reduce the active fuse area between the first and second electrodes. The purposeful misalignment between the electrodes of the MIM structure and the contact metal lines allows for sub-design rule fuse areas to be achieved.