Offset Piston Rod Geometry for Top Dead Centre Torque Gain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current combustion engines face inefficiencies due to the perpendicular alignment of the piston rod to the crankshaft at top dead centre, leading to reduced torque efficiency and increased risk of piston rod damage, along with excessive weight and wear from piston skirts.

Innovation Solution

The engine design features a piston rod with a first hub coupled to the crankshaft, a second hub aligned parallel to the first hub, and a third hub offset laterally to allow the piston to reach top dead centre at an angle, reducing perpendicular thrust and enhancing torque efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the piston rod is aligned perpendicular to the crankshaft at top dead centre, then the combustion chamber size is minimized and compression is maximized, but the torque efficiency is reduced and the piston rod is subjected to excessive perpendicular thrust

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompressionVSAvoidtorque efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The piston rod is designed with an asymmetric angular offset (α) relative to the crankshaft axis, rather than being perpendicular at top dead centre. This asymmetric configuration allows the piston rod to be offset by an angle α (5°-15°) from the perpendicular position, optimizing the torque transmission while maintaining effective compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameter of the piston rod-crankshaft alignment from a fixed perpendicular position to a variable angular offset (α). By adjusting this angle parameter, the system optimizes both the compression effectiveness and torque transmission efficiency simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If the piston rod is aligned perpendicular to the crankshaft at top dead centre, then the combustion is maximized, but the piston rod is subjected to excessive perpendicular thrust that may cause bending or breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecombustionVSAvoidpiston rod strength
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The piston rod is offset by an angle α from the perpendicular position to the crankshaft axis. This asymmetric alignment reduces the perpendicular thrust component acting on the piston rod, thereby decreasing the risk of bending or breaking while preserving combustion effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The angular offset is designed in advance to counteract the harmful perpendicular thrust. By pre-positioning the piston rod at an offset angle, the design proactively prevents excessive stress concentrations that would otherwise occur at the perpendicular alignment point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Stability of the object's composition

If piston skirts are made tall to maintain vertical piston position, then the piston stability is improved, but the engine weight and inertia increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston stabilityVSAvoidengine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the stability function from the tall piston skirts and transfers it to the piston rod's angular offset mechanism. By removing the excessive skirt height, the design eliminates unnecessary weight and inertia while maintaining piston stability through the offset alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical support function previously provided by tall piston skirts is replaced by the angular offset configuration of the piston rod. This substitution eliminates the need for heavy skirts while achieving the same stability objective through geometric optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Stability of the object's composition

If piston skirts are made tall to maintain vertical piston position, then the piston remains substantially vertical, but the lower edges cause increased irregular wear on the cylinder walls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston vertical positionVSAvoidcylinder wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the tall piston skirts that cause cylinder wear while extracting their stability function and transferring it to the piston rod's angular offset mechanism. This eliminates the harmful scraping action of skirt edges against cylinder walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical guidance function previously performed by tall piston skirts is replaced by the angular offset configuration. This substitution eliminates the harmful contact and wear between skirt edges and cylinder walls while maintaining piston alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration increases torque on the crankshaft, reduces piston weight and fuel consumption, decreases engine displacement, and significantly reduces CO and CO2 emissions by optimizing combustion at top dead centre.

Implementation Method 1

the piston rod comprises: a first hub arranged in its head for coupling with the crankshaft, a second hub arranged in its foot, and which is substantially aligned with or parallel to the first hub in the longitudinal direction of the cylinder when the crankshaft is in the upper or lower position, and a third hub also arranged in the foot of the piston rod, which is offset laterally towards the front with respect to the second hub

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentEP3751110B1Combustion engine
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 BRIZUELA FERNANDEZ FERNANDO
  • EP3751110B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3751110B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3751110B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention relates to a combustion engine (1), of the type that comprises a cylinder (4) with a piston (2) travelling through same, coupled by means of a piston rod (3) to a crankshaft (10), wherein the piston rod (3) comprises: - a first hub (5) in its head (30) for coupling with the crankshaft (10); - a second hub (6) in its foot (31) substantially aligned with or parallel to the first hub (5) in the longitudinal direction (40) of the cylinder when the crankshaft (10) is in the upper or lower position; and - a third hub (7) in its foot (31), which is offset laterally towards the front with respect to the second hub (6) in the direction of rotation of the crankshaft (10); - the piston (2) being coupled with the third hub (7), - comprising a guide (9) for the travel of the piston rod (3) coupled with the second hub (6), and - the piston (2) being coupled with the third hub (7) via a link rod (8).