Offset Sieve Mat Supports for Flip-Flow Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flip-flow type screening machines face challenges in material flow efficiency and stacking at frame tube locations due to uneven declination angles and stroke vibrations, leading to reduced material travel speeds and increased burden depth.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an offset configuration for sieve mat supports, where frame tubes are downwardly offset relative to balancer tubes, optimizing declination angles to enhance material velocity and reduce stacking, achieved by adjusting the declination angles and stroke vibrations across the screening deck.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If frame tubes are positioned in a standard linear arrangement with balancer tubes, then structural simplicity is maintained, but material stacking occurs and material travel speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial travel speedVSAvoidsupport structure configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by offsetting the frame tubes from the standard linear arrangement relative to the balancer tubes. This asymmetric positioning creates varying declination angles along the screening deck, which prevents material stacking and improves material travel speed by optimizing the flow path geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating different declination angles at different locations along the screening deck through the offset frame tube configuration. Each section of the screening deck experiences optimized local geometry tailored to material flow requirements, with steeper angles where needed to prevent stacking and maintain velocity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If standard linear support arrangement is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but material flow efficiency deteriorates due to stacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening efficiencyVSAvoidsupport frame assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric offset arrangement of frame tubes creates non-uniform declination angles that optimize material flow dynamics. This prevents material stacking and improves screening efficiency by maintaining consistent material velocity across the screening surface, despite the increased manufacturing complexity of the asymmetric support structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Speed

If uniform declination angles are maintained across the screening deck, then structural uniformity is preserved, but material velocity decreases and stacking increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial velocityVSAvoiddeclination angle uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating varying declination angles at different positions along the screening deck through the offset frame tube configuration. This local variation in geometry optimizes material velocity at each section, preventing stacking in low-velocity zones while maintaining overall system stability through controlled angular variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2782683B1Flexible mat screening apparatus with offset supports
Publication Date: 2022.06.29 ACTION EQUIPMENT CO INC
  • EP2782683B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2782683B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2782683B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Mechanical separators and screening machines, and methods for flexible sieve mat screening are disclosed. In an example configuration, a flip-flow type flexible mat screening apparatus is provided with optimized relative elevation positions for adjacent pairs of first and second mat supports. In one configuration, a portion of the first mat supports is arranged at a lowered or offset position relative to adjacent second mat supports.