Offset Tube Heat Exchanger Counter-Flow Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tube and fin heat exchangers face inefficiencies in heat transfer due to the alignment of tubes and fins, which limits the effectiveness of heat exchange between fluids and external mediums.

Innovation Solution

The heat exchanger design features tubes arranged in braided pairs with offset ends secured to header tanks via elbows, and additional cooling fins that direct fluids and air in counter-flow configurations, enhancing heat transfer by creating parallel and perpendicular airflow paths between tubes and fins.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If tubes are aligned directly with header tanks, then structural simplicity is improved, but heat transfer efficiency deteriorates due to limited counter-flow configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tube ends are offset from the header tanks rather than being directly aligned, creating an asymmetric configuration that enables counter-flow between the fluid in tubes and external medium. This asymmetric positioning allows the tube bundle to be staggered relative to the header tanks, improving heat transfer efficiency while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The offset configuration introduces a spatial dimension change by positioning tube ends at different locations relative to header tanks. This dimensional adjustment creates pathways for counter-flow heat exchange, transforming the heat transfer mechanism from simple parallel flow to efficient counter-flow configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If tubes are offset from header tanks via elbows, then heat transfer efficiency is improved through counter-flow configuration, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric offset positioning of tube ends relative to header tanks creates the necessary geometry for counter-flow heat exchange. By deliberately introducing asymmetry through elbow connections and offset positioning, the design achieves superior heat transfer efficiency that compensates for the increased structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Productivity

If fins are added to enhance heat transfer, then heat exchange effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange effectivenessVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling fins are integrated with the tube structure, merging the heat transfer enhancement function directly into the existing tube assembly. This integration approach improves heat exchange effectiveness while minimizing additional structural complexity compared to separate fin components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional tube alignment is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but heat transfer performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidheat transfer performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The offset tube configuration with elbow connections represents a deliberate departure from conventional symmetric alignment. While this asymmetric design improves heat transfer performance, it does introduce additional manufacturing steps compared to direct alignment, representing a trade-off that prioritizes performance over manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly improves heat transfer efficiency by ensuring a counter-flow of external mediums relative to the fluid flowing through the tubes, increasing the exchange of heat between the fluid and air, and allowing for efficient cooling of vehicle components.

Implementation Method 1

transfer heat between a fluid flowing through the tubes of the heat exchanger and air that is being direct across the fins of the heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

air that is being direct across the fins of the heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11187466B2Heat exchanger and heat exchanging system
Publication Date: 2021.11.30 DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INC
  • US11187466B2 patent drawing
  • US11187466B2 patent drawing
  • US11187466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A heat exchanger includes a first header tank, a second header tank, and a plurality of tubes. The plurality of tubes is arranged in braided pairs that extend in and are configured to direct a fluid between the first and second header tanks in a first direction. Each of the plurality of tubes have opposing ends that are respectively secured to the first and second header tanks via elbows such that the plurality of tubes are offset from the first and second header tanks.