Adjustable Offset Umbrella Sliding Member Winding Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adjustable offset umbrellas require excessive winding force and are prone to line binding and wear due to complex winding paths, making operation cumbersome and reducing leisure enjoyment.

Innovation Solution

The design features a sliding member on the main pole with a locking mechanism and a simplified winding element path, separating the functions of canopy raising and angle adjustment to reduce operational effort and wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a crank mechanism with complex winding path is used for raising and lowering the canopy, then the canopy can be adjusted, but the winding force required increases and the line binds and wears easily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidwinding force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the functions of raising/lowering the canopy and adjusting the canopy angle into two independent mechanisms: a reel mechanism for raising/lowering and a telescopic arm for angle adjustment. This segmentation eliminates the complex winding path that caused excessive winding force and line binding, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the angle adjustment function from the winding mechanism by introducing a separate telescopic arm that pivots relative to the main pole. This extraction removes the need for the line to follow a complex path through multiple turning points, thereby reducing winding force and preventing line binding while maintaining canopy adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If a crank mechanism with complex winding path is used for raising and lowering the canopy, then the canopy can be adjusted, but the line binds and wears easily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidline wear and binding
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the raising/lowering function (handled by the reel mechanism) from the angle adjustment function (handled by the telescopic arm), the patent eliminates the complex interaction between line winding and arm movement that caused binding and wear. This segmentation improves reliability by simplifying the line's path and reducing friction points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the crank mechanism is mounted to the main pole with the rope moving along a complex path, then the canopy can be raised and lowered, but the operation becomes burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecanopy adjustment capabilityVSAvoidoperational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single crank mechanism into two separate mechanisms: a reel mechanism for vertical canopy movement and a telescopic arm for angular adjustment. This segmentation eliminates the need for the user to operate a complex mechanism with multiple turning points, significantly reducing operational burden while preserving full canopy adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The telescopic arm is designed to pivot and extend dynamically, allowing the canopy angle to be adjusted independently of the canopy's vertical position. This dynamic design provides versatility in canopy positioning without requiring a complex fixed-path winding mechanism, thereby reducing operational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If the same mechanism is used for both raising/lowering and angle adjustment, then the device is simpler, but the operational effort for each function increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism complexityVSAvoidoperational effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent accepts increased device complexity as a trade-off to reduce operational effort by segmenting the single mechanism into two specialized mechanisms: a reel for raising/lowering and a telescopic arm for angle adjustment. Each mechanism handles one function independently, reducing the effort required for each operation despite adding a component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8104492B2Adjustable offset umbrella
Publication Date: 2012.01.31 ATLEISURE
  • US8104492B2 patent drawing
  • US8104492B2 patent drawing
  • US8104492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable offset umbrella has a generally vertical main pole and a sliding member slidably mounted to the main pole. The sliding member includes a locking mechanism for securing it at a desired location along the main pole. One end of an arm is associated with the sliding member, and the other end supports an umbrella canopy. A winding mechanism is associated with the sliding member and moves with it. A line extends from the winding mechanism to the umbrella canopy. Operating the winding mechanism opens and closes the umbrella canopy, and moving the sliding member up or down the main pole adjusts the angle of the canopy with respect to the main pole.