Oldham Nut Shrinkage Control via Fiber Reinforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing plastic Oldham nut parts made from PEEK exhibit significant shrinkage and thickness variations during injection molding, leading to shape defects and a high scrap rate due to their high melting temperature, which increases manufacturing costs and reduces mechanical strength.

Innovation Solution

A plastic Oldham nut part with uniform thickness and reinforcing ribs is designed, made from polymer materials like polyamide or polyphthalamide filled with glass or carbon fibers, reducing material thickness and the risk of air inclusions while enhancing mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the part is made from PEEK material with high melting temperature, then the mechanical properties are sufficiently close to metal, but significant shrinkage occurs during cooling leading to shape defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidshape defects
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from PEEK to polyamide or polyphthalamide, which have lower melting temperatures. This parameter change reduces the shrinkage during cooling while maintaining sufficient mechanical properties through glass or carbon fiber reinforcement, thereby resolving the contradiction between mechanical strength and manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by incorporating glass fibers or carbon fibers into the polyamide or polyphthalamide matrix. This composite approach enhances the mechanical properties to compensate for the lower base material strength, while the composite structure also helps reduce anisotropic shrinkage and improve dimensional stability during molding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If the thickness of plastic material varies at different points, then the part can accommodate functional requirements, but differences in shrinkage generate defects and increase scrap rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional requirementsVSAvoidshrinkage defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding reinforcing ribs at specific locations where structural support is needed, rather than uniformly increasing thickness throughout. This allows the part to maintain functional adaptability while minimizing overall material thickness variations, thereby reducing shrinkage defects and improving manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from varying thickness in one dimension to adding structural reinforcement in another dimension through ribs. Instead of increasing material thickness to achieve structural requirements, the ribs provide structural support through geometric configuration, maintaining uniform base thickness and reducing shrinkage-related defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If the thickness of plastic material is reduced, then shrinkage defects are minimized, but the mechanical strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrinkage defectsVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by incorporating glass fibers or carbon fibers into the polyamide or polyphthalamide matrix. This composite approach enhances the mechanical properties to compensate for the lower base material strength, while the composite structure also helps reduce anisotropic shrinkage and improve dimensional stability during molding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by adding reinforcing ribs at specific locations where structural support is needed, rather than uniformly increasing thickness throughout. This allows the part to maintain functional adaptability while minimizing overall material thickness variations, thereby reducing shrinkage defects and improving manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If the scrap rate is reduced through design modifications, then manufacturing costs decrease, but the structural integrity must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrap rateVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by incorporating glass fibers or carbon fibers into the polyamide or polyphthalamide matrix. This composite approach enhances the mechanical properties to compensate for the lower base material strength, while the composite structure also helps reduce anisotropic shrinkage and improve dimensional stability during molding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by adding reinforcing ribs at specific locations where structural support is needed, rather than uniformly increasing thickness throughout. This allows the part to maintain functional adaptability while minimizing overall material thickness variations, thereby reducing shrinkage defects and improving manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the scrap rate and manufacturing costs by minimizing shrinkage-related defects and improving mechanical strength, making the parts suitable for applications like power steering systems.

Implementation Method 1

the part according to the invention is made of polymer material filled with glass or carbon fibers, which makes it possible to improve the intrinsic mechanical properties of this part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiber reinforcement: Composite Materials

Implementation Method 2

due to the very high melting temperature of PEEK, a non-negligible shrinkage occurs during the cooling of the part, after its injection molding. However, the variations in thickness of plastic material at different points of the part lead to differences in shrinkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal shrinkage: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentEP1813830B1Part made from plastic material forming an Oldham nut
Publication Date: 2010.10.06 COMPAGNIE PLASTIC OMNIUM SA
  • EP1813830B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The Oldham coupling, used in motor vehicles, has two coaxial orifices (12, 13) to receive shafts, is made from a polymer material with glass or carbon fibre filling and has a thickness at any point that is less than 4 mm and preferably less than 2 mm. The two orifices are elongated in shape and lie perpendicular to one another, and the coupling is reinforced by ribs (16, 17, 18) connected to the walls (14, 15) surrounding the orifices.