Dynamic Granularity Adjustment for OLED Image Sticking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

OLED displays experience luminance degradation over time due to uneven usage of pixels, leading to color shift and burn-in, which complicates their adoption in applications like personal computing where image sticking is a concern.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically adjusts the granularity of pixel history collection and image transformation algorithms based on differential aging of screen areas, allowing for a balance between image quality, power consumption, and performance by grouping pixels into blocks and adjusting brightness accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pixel history tracking and image transformation algorithms are applied at sub-pixel level, then image quality is improved, but power consumption and memory usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the display screen into multiple blocks of varying sizes. High-risk blocks (prone to image sticking) are tracked at fine granularity (sub-pixel level), while low-risk blocks are tracked at coarse granularity (block level). This segmentation allows the system to apply compensation algorithms selectively, improving image quality where needed while reducing overall power consumption and memory usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements differential tracking granularity across different regions of the display. Instead of uniformly applying sub-pixel level tracking to the entire screen, the system adapts the tracking granularity locally based on the risk of image sticking in each block. This local quality approach optimizes the balance between image quality and resource consumption by applying high-precision tracking only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If pixel history tracking is applied at sub-pixel level, then compensation accuracy is improved, but memory usage increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation accuracyVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the display into blocks with different tracking granularities. By storing pixel history data at sub-pixel level only for high-risk blocks and at block level for low-risk blocks, the system significantly reduces total memory usage while maintaining compensation accuracy in critical areas where image sticking is most likely to occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies full-precision sub-pixel level tracking only to the extent necessary (partial action) - specifically to blocks identified as high-risk for image sticking. For the majority of blocks where image sticking is less likely, the system uses coarser block-level tracking, thereby reducing overall memory requirements while maintaining adequate compensation accuracy where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If image transformation algorithms are applied at larger granularity (block level), then power consumption and processing time are reduced, but image quality and long-term effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the display into blocks and applies different processing granularities to different blocks. High-risk blocks undergo sub-pixel level image transformation for optimal quality, while low-risk blocks use block-level transformation for efficiency. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by ensuring high processing efficiency overall while maintaining image quality in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by adapting the image transformation granularity to the specific needs of each block. In regions prone to image sticking, the system applies high-precision sub-pixel level transformation to maintain image quality. In stable regions, block-level transformation suffices, providing adequate quality while improving processing efficiency and reducing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If uniform block size is used for pixel history collection, then implementation simplicity is improved, but ability to handle differential aging across screen areas deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoiddifferential aging handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic block sizing where blocks are not uniform in size but are adapted based on the differential aging characteristics of different screen areas. The system dynamically adjusts block dimensions to match regions with similar degradation patterns, allowing fine-grained tracking in high-risk areas while using larger blocks in stable areas. This dynamic approach maintains implementation relative simplicity while significantly improving the ability to handle differential aging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using different block sizes for different regions of the display. Instead of a uniform block structure, the system creates variable-sized blocks that reflect the local degradation characteristics of each screen area. This allows the implementation to remain relatively simple while effectively capturing and responding to differential aging patterns across the display surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10572965B2Dynamic granularity adjustment
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 INTEL CORP
  • US10572965B2 patent drawing
  • US10572965B2 patent drawing
  • US10572965B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for displaying content on an OLED display while decreasing the appearance of image sticking are provided. In an example, a computing system, includes an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display and a memory to store pixel history values for blocks of pixels in the OLED display. A granularity selector determines a size for the blocks of pixels in the OLED display.