Organic Light-Emitting Display Panel Electron Injection Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional organic light-emitting diodes suffer from insufficient electron injection and mobility, leading to a decrease in light-emitting efficiency due to the deviation of electron recombination centers from the light-emitting layer.

Innovation Solution

An organic light-emitting display panel design incorporating a specific structure with an anode, cathode, and organic functional layer, including a first and second electron transmission layer with alkaline earth or rare earth metal elements, where the work functions and molecular orbitals are optimized to enhance electron injection and mobility, and prevent dopant diffusion to improve light-emitting efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional organic light-emitting diode structure is used, then device simplicity is maintained, but electron injection and mobility are insufficient causing recombination center deviation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron injection and mobilityVSAvoidorganic functional layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The organic functional layer is segmented into multiple distinct layers: electron injection layer, first electron transmission layer, organic light-emitting layer, second electron transmission layer, and hole transmission layer. Each layer has specific thickness ranges and material compositions optimized for its function, enabling improved electron injection and mobility while maintaining manageable structural complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures where each layer contains specific organic compounds with tailored properties. For example, the electron injection layer uses compounds like Alq3 or BCP with specific HOMO/LUMO energy levels, while the light-emitting layer uses emitters like Ir(III) or Pt(II) complexes coordinated with cyclometalating ligands. These composite material designs optimize electron transport and recombination processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If electron transmission layers with alkaline earth or rare earth metal elements are added, then electron mobility is improved, but device structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron mobilityVSAvoidnumber of layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Alkaline earth metal elements (Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba) or rare earth metal elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu) are selectively incorporated into specific layers (electron injection layer and first electron transmission layer) where they provide optimal electron transport properties. This localized use of specialized materials improves electron mobility without requiring all layers to be complex, as each layer has its own optimized composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the thickness parameters of each layer to control electron transport efficiency. The electron injection layer is designed with thickness of 0.1-10 nm, first electron transmission layer with 10-50 nm, and second electron transmission layer with 10-100 nm. By adjusting these thickness parameters along with material composition, the patent achieves improved electron mobility while controlling the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized structure improves electron injection and mobility, reduces potential barriers, and enhances light-emitting efficiency by ensuring electrons do not accumulate at interfaces, thereby increasing the response speed and light output of the organic light-emitting display panel.

Implementation Method 1

improve the injection and mobility of electrons in an organic light-emitting diode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron injection:

Implementation Method 2

improve the injection and mobility of electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron mobility:

Implementation Method 3

a work function φ1 of the electron injection layer and a work function φ2 of the cathode satisfy: φ1≥φ2-3.0 eV

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork function:

Implementation Method 4

The organic light-emitting diode emits light through a light-emitting layer disposed between an anode and a cathode under an electric field applied between the anode and the cathode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Implementation Method 5

prevent dopant diffusion to improve light-emitting efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion barrier: Diffusion Barrier

Data Source

PatentUS10516125B1Organic light-emitting display panel and display device
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 WUHAN TIANMA MICRO ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10516125B1 patent drawing
  • US10516125B1 patent drawing
  • US10516125B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are an organic light-emitting display panel and a display device. The organic light-emitting display includes an array substrate and organic light-emitting components each having anode, cathode and organic functional layer. The organic functional layer includes an organic light-emitting layer, a first and second electron transmission layer and an electron injection layer. The first electron transmission layer and electron injection layer include a first dopant containing an alkaline earth metal element or a rare earth metal element. A work function φ1 of the electron injection layer and a work function φ2 of the cathode satisfy: φ1<φ2, and the work function φ1 of the electron injection layer and a work function φ3 of the first dopant satisfy: φ1≥φ3. LUMO1 and LUMO2 satisfy: |LUMO1−LUMO2|<0.18 eV.