Adaptive Frame Rate Control for OLED Burn-in Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing OLED display technologies face challenges in preventing the burn-in phenomenon and maintaining image quality, especially when displaying still images, as current frame rate control methods are not adaptive to the type of image or panel used.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device that divides the display image into blocks, generates brightness distributions in multiple directions, determines the image type based on these distributions, and performs frame rate control accordingly, using modes such as interlaced scanning, frame rate reduction, image thinning, and image shifting to reduce flicker and extend panel lifetime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If frame rate control is performed on OLED display to prevent burn-in phenomenon, then the lifetime of display panel is extended, but image quality may deteriorate due to flicker or loss of gray scale gradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifetime of display panelVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the frame rate control adaptable and variable based on image characteristics. The system dynamically adjusts the frame rate control strategy according to the detected image type (still image, moving image, gradient image, etc.) and panel type, rather than using a fixed frame rate control method. This allows the system to optimize between burn-in prevention and image quality maintenance based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of frame rate control based on image characteristics and panel type. By detecting image types (still, moving, gradient, etc.) and panel types (OLED, LCD), the system adjusts frame rate control parameters to achieve optimal balance between preventing burn-in and maintaining image quality, expressed as higher image quality and burn-in prevention regardless of display panels or display images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If frame rate control is performed at high speeds on OLED to express more gray scale gradation, then image quality is improved, but the burn-in phenomenon may occur more frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidlifetime of display panel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts frame rate control speed based on image characteristics. For images with high burn-in risk (still images, images with large bright areas), the system reduces frame rate control speed to prevent burn-in. For images where image quality is more critical and burn-in risk is lower, the system can maintain higher frame rate control speeds to express more gray scale gradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the frame rate control parameter based on image type detection. When still images or images with large bright areas are detected, the system reduces the frame rate control parameter to prevent burn-in. When moving images or images with balanced brightness are detected, the system can maintain higher frame rate control parameters to improve image quality through more gray scale gradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional frame rate control is performed regardless of image type, then the control process is simple, but image quality cannot be improved or burn-in cannot be satisfactorily prevented for all display scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol process complexityVSAvoideffectiveness of burn-in prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting image characteristics before performing frame rate control. The system first detects the image type (still image, moving image, gradient image, etc.) and panel type, then selects the appropriate frame rate control strategy based on the detection results. This preliminary detection and classification enables the system to apply the most effective burn-in prevention method for each specific scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from image type detection and panel type detection to adjust the frame rate control strategy. By continuously monitoring image characteristics and comparing them against predefined thresholds, the system feedback-adjusts the frame rate control parameters to achieve optimal burn-in prevention and image quality maintenance for each specific display scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8643581B2Image processing device, display system, electronic apparatus, and image processing method
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8643581B2 patent drawing
  • US8643581B2 patent drawing
  • US8643581B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing device performing a frame rate control a display timing control signal corresponding to an image data, includes: a brightness distribution generating unit that generates a brightness distribution on the basis of the image data; an image type determining unit that determines a type of an image on the basis of the brightness distribution; and a frame rate control unit that performs frame rate control corresponding to the determined image type.