Inorganic Hole Injection Layer for OLED Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) face challenges in achieving optimal hole injection efficiency and luminescence performance due to limitations in the work function and structural characteristics of traditional hole injection layers, which affect the overall efficiency and manufacturing complexity of OLED devices.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an inorganic hole injection layer with a specific oxide structure, such as molybdenum-tantalum-oxygen (Mo-Ta-O), between the anode electrode and the organic emission layer, featuring a higher work function than the anode, optimized thickness, and surface roughness, and etched simultaneously with the anode to enhance hole injection and simplify the manufacturing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional hole injection layer is used in OLED, then the device structure is simpler, but the hole injection efficiency and luminescence performance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole injection efficiencyVSAvoidlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite inorganic hole injection layer comprising multiple oxide materials (e.g., MoO3, Ta2O5, Nb2O5, VN, or TiO2) with specific atomic ratios. This composite structure combines the advantages of different materials to achieve optimal work function (5.0-5.8 eV) and hole injection efficiency, resolving the contradiction between performance improvement and structural simplicity by using a multi-material composite rather than a single complex layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically optimizes key parameters of the hole injection layer including work function (5.0-5.8 eV), thickness (10-50 Å), and surface roughness (0.3-0.5 nm). By precisely controlling these parameters, the invention achieves high hole injection efficiency while maintaining a relatively simple single-layer structure, thus resolving the contradiction between performance and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the inorganic hole injection layer has higher work function than the anode, then hole injection is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole injection efficiencyVSAvoidwork function control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a specific work function range (5.0-5.8 eV) for the inorganic hole injection layer that is higher than the anode work function. This parameter optimization enables effective hole injection while providing a clear manufacturing target, reducing the actual precision control difficulty by defining an optimal range rather than a single precise value

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By using composite oxide materials with adjustable compositions (e.g., varying ratios of MoO3, Ta2O5, Nb2O5, VN, or TiO2), the patent can tune the work function within the optimal range (5.0-5.8 eV). This material flexibility allows manufacturers to achieve the required work function through compositional adjustment rather than precise thickness control, thereby reducing manufacturing precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the inorganic hole injection layer thickness is optimized, then luminescence efficiency is improved, but the surface roughness control becomes more critical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminescence efficiencyVSAvoidsurface roughness control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the thickness of the inorganic hole injection layer to a specific range (10-50 Å) to achieve high luminescence efficiency. Within this thickness range, the layer is thin enough to maintain good optical transparency and efficient hole injection, while thick enough to provide sufficient hole transport capability, thereby maximizing luminescence efficiency with manageable surface roughness requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves luminescence efficiency and simplifies the manufacturing process by ensuring effective hole injection and maintaining optical efficiency while preventing degradation, thus enhancing the performance and production efficiency of OLEDs.

Implementation Method 1

A work function of the inorganic hole injection layer may be greater than a work function of the first electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork function:

Data Source

PatentUS10910583B2Organic light-emitting diode and organic light-emitting display device including the same
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US10910583B2 patent drawing
  • US10910583B2 patent drawing
  • US10910583B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An organic light-emitting diode includes a first electrode and a second electrode that face each other, an organic emission layer between the first electrode and the second electrode, and an inorganic hole injection layer between the first electrode and the organic emission layer. The inorganic hole injection layer includes oxide of a form A-B-O, including an element A and an element B. The element A is one of molybdenum (Mo) and tungsten (W). The element B is one of vanadium (V), niobium (Nb), and tantalum (Ta). An atom content (x) of the element B is greater than 0 and no more than 15 at % (0<x≤15 at %) based on a total atom content of the inorganic hole injection layer.