Organic OLED Emission Layer Structure for Hole Trap Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing organic optoelectronic devices face challenges in achieving high efficiency, low driving voltage, and long lifespan.

Innovation Solution

The device incorporates a specific layer structure with a first and second light emitting layer, each containing a host and dopant combination, including an iridium complex and a platinum complex, and calculates the hole trap index to optimize the light emitting zone towards the anode, using compounds like N-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-9,9-dimethyl-N-(4-(9-phenyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)phenyl)-9H-fluoren-2-amine and N-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-N-(2-(9,9-diphenyl-9H-fluoren-4-yl)phenyl)-9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine, to enhance performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a conventional single light emitting layer structure is used, then the device structure is simple, but the efficiency and lifespan are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice efficiencyVSAvoidlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the light emitting layer into two distinct layers: a first light emitting layer containing a first host compound and first dopant, and a second light emitting layer containing a second host compound and second dopant. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for specific functions, improving overall device efficiency while managing complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each light emitting layer is assigned different local qualities through specific compound selections and dopant concentrations. The first light emitting layer uses an iridium complex dopant optimized for certain emission characteristics, while the second light emitting layer uses a platinum complex dopant with different properties, allowing localized optimization of emission efficiency and color characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high efficiency materials are used, then the device performance improves, but the driving voltage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminous efficiencyVSAvoiddriving voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device optimizes multiple parameters including dopant concentration (1-10 wt%), host compound molecular weight ratios, and layer thicknesses to achieve the optimal balance between luminous efficiency and driving voltage. By carefully adjusting these parameters, the device achieves high efficiency without excessive voltage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Each light emitting layer uses a composite material system combining specific host compounds with metal complex dopants. The first light emitting layer combines a first host compound with an iridium complex, while the second light emitting layer combines a second host compound with a platinum complex, creating composite materials that optimize both efficiency and electrical characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Speed

If the light emitting zone is positioned towards the cathode, then the electron transport is improved, but the hole transport becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron transport speedVSAvoidcharge balance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the charge transport functions across two light emitting layers. The first light emitting layer is optimized for hole transport with appropriate host and dopant selection, while the second light emitting layer is optimized for electron transport. This segmentation ensures both charge carriers are efficiently transported to their respective zones, maintaining charge balance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface between the two light emitting layers acts as an intermediary zone that facilitates balanced charge transport. The specific combination of host compounds and dopants in each layer creates energy level alignments that enable smooth charge transfer across the interface, ensuring both holes and electrons are properly transported

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a high-efficiency, low-driving voltage, and long-lasting organic optoelectronic device.

Implementation Method 1

the first dopant is an iridium complex and the second dopant is a platinum complex

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Data Source

PatentEP4719020A1Organic optoelectronic device and display device
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD
  • EP4719020A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4719020A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4719020A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is an organic optoelectronic device and display device including an anode and a cathode facing each other, an intermediate layer between the anode and the cathode, wherein the intermediate layer includes a first light emitting layer and a second light emitting layer, the first light emitting layer is disposed between an anode and a second light emitting layer, and includes a first host including a composition of a first compound and a second compound, and a first dopant, the second light emitting layer is disposed between the cathode and the first light emitting layer, and includes a second host including a composition of a third compound and a fourth compound and a second dopant, the first dopant is an iridium complex and the second dopant is a platinum complex, and the organic optoelectronic device satisfies Formula 1: hole trap index of the first light emitting layer > hole trap index of the second light emitting layer The hole trap index is calculated according to Formula 2: hole trap index = [1 - {(current density measured at 7 V voltage after doping the dopant in the light emitting layer in HOD (Hole Only Device))/(current density measured at 7 V voltage before doping the dopant in the light emitting layer in HOD (Hole Only Device))}] * 100, HOD: ITO/Compound E (1,400 Å)/Compound F (1% NDP-9 doping, 100 Å)/Compound F (200 Å)/light emitting layer (400 Å)/ HAT-CN (100 Å) / Ag (50 Å) / Mg:Ag (9:1, 550 Å); Compound E: N-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-9,9-dimethyl-N-(4-(9-phenyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)phenyl)-9H-fluoren-2-amine; and Compound F: N-([1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-N-(2-(9,9-diphenyl-9H-fluoren-4-yl)phenyl)-9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-amine).