Combinatorial Screening for OLED Host Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The discovery of new materials for organic electronics, such as OLEDs, is hindered by traditional serial methods that are time-consuming, costly, and inefficient, relying on trial and error rather than a directed approach.

Innovation Solution

The development of compound libraries and methods for querying these libraries to rapidly test and identify materials with desirable properties, using combinatorial materials science and computational tools to explore vast chemical spaces and identify optimal electronic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional serial methods are used to discover new materials for OLEDs, then researchers can thoroughly test each material, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial testing thoroughnessVSAvoiddiscovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the material discovery process into two distinct phases: (1) computational screening of large compound libraries to identify candidate materials with desired properties, and (2) experimental validation of selected candidates. This segmentation allows rapid filtering of thousands of compounds computationally before investing time in laboratory testing, thereby reducing overall discovery time while maintaining thoroughness for promising candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational analysis of material properties (electronic structure, optical characteristics, stability) before actual synthesis and device fabrication. By using density functional theory (DFT) calculations and other computational tools to pre-screen compounds, researchers identify only the most promising candidates for experimental testing, eliminating the need to thoroughly test every possible material in the laboratory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional trial and error methods are used, then researchers can identify working materials, but the cost and inefficiency increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial performanceVSAvoiddiscovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where computational predictions of material properties guide experimental synthesis and testing, and experimental results feed back into refining computational models. This iterative feedback process increases reliability by continuously validating and improving the predictive accuracy of computational methods, while simultaneously improving productivity by reducing failed experimental attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies key parameters in computational models (such as exchange-correlation functionals in DFT calculations, basis sets, and structural configurations) to optimize predictions of material properties. By carefully controlling and adjusting these parameters, researchers achieve reliable predictions of OLED-relevant properties (electronic structure, optical gaps, charge transport) that guide efficient material selection without requiring extensive trial-and-error experimentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If vast chemical spaces are explored to find optimal materials, then better OLED performance can be achieved, but the complexity of the search process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property rangeVSAvoidsearch process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal computational framework that can screen for multiple OLED-relevant properties simultaneously (electronic structure, optical characteristics, charge transport, molecular stability) using the same theoretical methods and software platform. This multi-functional approach allows exploration of vast chemical spaces across diverse property dimensions without proportionally increasing process complexity, as a single computational workflow evaluates multiple critical parameters for each candidate compound.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10002214B2Host materials and ligands for dopants in organic light emitting diodes
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • US10002214B2 patent drawing
  • US10002214B2 patent drawing
  • US10002214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compound libraries, systems, methods, and apparatus, including computer program apparatus, are described for implementing techniques for processing data from a combinatorial inquiry to determine materials of use in various photoelectronic devices, e.g., organic light emitting diodes. The libraries include a collection of putative compounds of use as components of OLED devices, which are cross-referenced with one or more electronic property relevant to the efficacy of the compounds in an OLED device. The techniques broadly include receiving data from a chemical experiment on a library of materials having a plurality of members and generating a queriable representation of the chemical experiment. The chemical experiment is optionally an in silico experiment.