OLED Pixel Arrangement Layout for Aperture and Deposition Balance
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing OLED displays face a trade-off between deposition reliability and aperture ratio, where reducing gaps between pixels deteriorates deposition reliability while increasing gaps reduces the aperture ratio, affecting manufacturing efficiency and display quality.
Innovation Solution
A pixel arrangement structure for OLED displays is designed with first, second, and third pixels having specific polygonal shapes and areas, where the second and third pixels enclose the first pixel, maintaining efficient gaps and improving aperture ratio.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Area of stationary object
If the gap between neighboring pixels is reduced to obtain a high aperture ratio, then the aperture ratio is improved, but deposition reliability is deteriorated
Solution Approach 1:
The pixel array is segmented into different pixel types (first pixels with quadrilateral shapes, second pixels with hexagonal shapes, third pixels with octagonal shapes) arranged in a specific pattern. This segmentation allows different regions to have different gap characteristics, enabling the overall aperture ratio to be improved while maintaining adequate gaps in critical deposition areas through the specific geometric arrangement of polygonal pixels.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs asymmetric pixel arrangements where first pixels have quadrilateral shapes, second pixels have hexagonal shapes, and third pixels have octagonal shapes. These asymmetric geometric forms create varied gap distributions that simultaneously achieve high aperture ratio and adequate deposition reliability by optimizing the spatial relationship between adjacent pixels of different types.
2Reliability
If the gap between pixels is increased to improve deposition reliability, then deposition reliability is improved, but the aperture ratio of pixels is deteriorated
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transitions from conventional uniform pixel arrangements to a multi-dimensional polygonal pixel structure where first, second, and third pixels with different geometric shapes (quadrilateral, hexagonal, octagonal) are arranged in alternating patterns. This dimensional complexity in pixel geometry enables optimized gap control in multiple directions simultaneously, achieving both high aperture ratio and deposition reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
Different regions of the pixel array exhibit different gap characteristics through the use of locally optimized pixel shapes and arrangements. First pixels, second pixels, and third pixels are strategically positioned to create locally adapted gap structures that ensure adequate deposition reliability in critical areas while maximizing aperture ratio in display areas.
3Ease of manufacture
If non-polygonal pixel shapes are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but aperture ratio and display quality are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent systematically varies geometric parameters of pixel shapes (number of sides, angular configurations, relative positioning) to create first, second, and third pixels with quadrilateral, hexagonal, and octagonal forms. These parameter changes in pixel geometry enable optimization of both aperture ratio and display quality while maintaining compatibility with existing manufacturing processes through precise geometric definition.
Data Source
AI summary
A pixel arrangement structure of an organic light emitting diode (OLED) display is provided. The pixel arrangement structure includes: a first pixel having a center coinciding with a center of a virtual square; a second pixel separated from the first pixel and having a center at a first vertex of the virtual square; and a third pixel separated from the first pixel and the second pixel, and having a center at a second vertex neighboring the first vertex of the virtual square. The first pixel, the second pixel, and the third pixel have polygonal shapes.


