Base Oil Production via Olefin Oligomerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of high molecular weight paraffins and isoparaffins for base oil stocks from hydrocarbon streams is economically challenging due to the need for expensive high-purity feed streams and complex processing steps, such as syngas production and Fischer-Tropsch reactions, which are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that involves cracking a light hydrocarbon stream to form an impure olefinic stream, separating and oligomerizing it using a homogeneous catalyst to increase carbon atoms, followed by hydro-processing to produce a base oil stock, which reduces costs by utilizing lower-cost hydrocarbon feedstocks and simplifying the processing steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional methods (syngas production, Fischer-Tropsch reactions) are used to produce high molecular weight paraffins, then base oil stocks can be manufactured, but the production cost increases and processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase oil stock productionVSAvoidprocessing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the base oil production process into distinct functional units: a cracker for producing olefinic streams, a separator for purifying the olefinic stream, an oligomerization reactor for increasing molecular weight, and a distillation column for product separation. This segmentation allows each unit to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall process compared to integrated syngas-based routes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes impurities from the olefinic stream using a separator unit before oligomerization. This extraction of harmful impurities (such as sulfur compounds, nitrogen compounds, and heavy hydrocarbons) enables the use of simpler, less expensive catalysts and processing conditions in subsequent oligomerization and hydro-processing steps, reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If high purity feed streams are used for oligomerization, then product quality improves, but feedstock cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidfeedstock cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a separator unit as an intermediary between the cracker and oligomerization reactor. This separator acts as a mediator that selectively removes impurities from the olefinic stream while retaining the valuable olefins. The result is a purified feed stream suitable for oligomerization that costs less than conventional high-purity ethylene or propylene feedstocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a disposable-like approach by using a dedicated separator unit that consumes energy and materials to purify the feed stream once, enabling the use of lower-cost cracker-grade olefins instead of expensive polymer-grade feedstocks. This single purification step makes the overall process economically viable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If complex processing steps (steam reforming, methanol synthesis, MTO) are used, then high molecular weight paraffins can be produced, but production time increases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase oil stock production rateVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple traditional processing steps into a streamlined sequence: cracking directly produces olefins that are immediately separated and oligomerized, followed by hydro-processing. This merged process eliminates the time-consuming intermediate steps of syngas production, methanol synthesis, and MTO reactions, significantly reducing total processing time while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary oligomerization of olefins to higher molecular weight compounds before hydro-processing. This preliminary action creates the desired molecular weight distribution early in the process, allowing the subsequent hydro-processing step to focus only on saturation and impurity removal, thereby reducing overall processing time compared to traditional routes that must build molecular weight during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If syngas production and Fischer-Tropsch reactions are used, then linear high molecular weight products can be synthesized, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelinear paraffin productionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies the essential function of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (producing linear paraffins) but uses a different, more economical pathway: direct oligomerization of olefins followed by hydro-processing. This copied approach achieves the same product quality (linear high molecular weight paraffins) without the expensive syngas production and Fischer-Tropsch reaction steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the efficient production of high-quality base oil stocks from lower-cost light hydrocarbon streams, reducing the economic burden of traditional methods by using a streamlined process that includes cracking, oligomerization, and hydro-processing to achieve higher molecular weight products.

Implementation Method 1

a cracker configured to form a raw hydrocarbon stream from the light hydrocarbon stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCracking: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

an oligomerization reactor configured to increase a number of carbon atoms in molecules of the raw olefinic stream forming a raw oligomer stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOligomerization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

A distillation column is configured to separate a light olefinic stream from the raw oligomer stream for recovery of light linear alpha olefins. The distillation column is configured to further separate the raw oligomer stream into an intermediate olefinic stream and a heavy olefinic stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 4

A hydro-processing reactor is configured to hydro-process the heavy olefinic stream to form a hydro-processed stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS11015131B2Manufacturing hydrocarbons
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO
  • US11015131B2 patent drawing
  • US11015131B2 patent drawing
  • US11015131B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for manufacturing a base oil stock from a light hydrocarbon stream are provided. An example method includes cracking a light hydrocarbon stream to form an impure olefinic stream, separating water from the impure olefinic stream, and oligomerizing the impure olefinic stream to form a raw oligomer stream. A light olefinic stream from the raw oligomer stream and linear alpha olefins are recovered from the light olefinic stream. A heavy olefinic stream is distilled from the raw oligomer stream and hydro-processed to form a hydro-processed stream. They hydro-processed stream is distilled to form the base oil stock.