Olefin Oligomerization Process with Segmented Reactors and Thermal Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing olefin oligomerization processes face challenges with low olefin concentrations and high inert fractions, leading to suboptimal conversions and energy inefficiencies, particularly when using naphtha as a raw material, which is being replaced by cheaper ethane from shale gas.

Innovation Solution

A process involving at least three reaction stages connected in series, with each stage comprising a reactor and a distillation column, where the starting mixture is divided into feed streams with less than 50% olefin content, using a nickel compound on an aluminosilicate catalyst, and employing adiabatic operation in the last reactor to optimize olefin utilization and energy management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the starting mixture is fed directly to a single reaction stage, then the process is simple, but conversion is insufficient at low olefin concentrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolefin conversionVSAvoidnumber of reaction stages
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The oligomerization process is divided into multiple reaction stages (first, second, and third reaction stages) with separate reactors and distillation columns. Each stage processes a portion of the feed stream, allowing incremental conversion of olefins even at low concentrations. The segmented approach enables each reactor to operate optimally without being overwhelmed by the entire feed load, thereby improving overall conversion while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multiple reaction stages are used to improve conversion, then olefin utilization increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolefin conversionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The distillation columns from different reaction stages are thermally integrated through heat exchangers. The overhead condensers of upstream distillation columns (first and second stages) provide cooling duty to the reboilers of downstream distillation columns (second and third stages). This merging of thermal functions allows heat generated in earlier stages to be reused in subsequent stages, significantly reducing external energy requirements while maintaining high olefin conversion across all stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the feed stream has low olefin content, then the process can handle cheaper feedstocks, but conversion efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock flexibilityVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The feed stream is divided into multiple portions that are distributed to different reaction stages. This segmentation allows each reactor to process a manageable portion of the low-olefin feed, maintaining adequate conversion efficiency in each stage. The modular structure enables the system to adapt to varying feedstock qualities while preserving productivity through optimized distribution of the feed across stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If adiabatic operation is used in the last reactor, then energy efficiency improves, but temperature control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The third reaction stage operates adiabatically, allowing the exothermic oligomerization reaction to self-regulate the temperature through the natural heat generation and consumption within the reactor. The system uses its own reaction heat to drive the process, eliminating the need for external heating or cooling utilities in the final stage. This self-service approach improves energy efficiency while the distributed reaction stages ensure that temperature management remains manageable through the sequential processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enhances olefin conversion and space-time yields, even at low olefin concentrations, and reduces energy consumption by utilizing heat from the last reaction stage for subsequent distillation, thereby improving the economic and technical efficiency of the oligomerization process.

Implementation Method 1

oligomerization, using an oligomerization catalyst, of the olefins in the feed stream to the first reaction stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

separating the oligomers formed in this case as bottom product in a downstream distillation column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 3

the reactors in the preceding reaction stages are cooled using a cooling medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 4

the reactor(s) in the last reaction stage are operated adiabatically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic process: Adiabatic Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10793488B2Process for oligomerizing olefins with streams having a reduced olefin content
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 EVONIK OXENO GMBH & CO KG
  • US10793488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process is used for oligomerizing C2- to C8-olefins in several reaction stages in which the starting mixture and the respective outputs from the reaction stages are separated and are fed to different reaction stages.