Olfactory Test Compositions Using Odorant Ensembles and Triangle Tests

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smell tests are unreliable due to sensitivity variations among individuals and the influence of prior olfactory experiences, leading to misdiagnosis and difficulty in accurately assessing olfactory function.

Innovation Solution

Development of compositions and methods using distinct ensembles of odorants in various dilutions for assessing olfactory sensitivity and resolution, employing triangle tests to quantify and score these abilities, and providing kits for self-administered tests that minimize cultural and semantic biases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If monomolecular odorants are used in smell tests, then the test can be simple to administer, but sensitivity variations among individuals lead to unreliable results and misdiagnosis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of administering smell testVSAvoidreliability of smell test results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the odor stimulus into multiple distinct odorants presented separately rather than as a single monomolecular odorant. Each odorant is administered individually in a series of presentations, allowing the system to assess overall olfactory function while compensating for individual variations in sensitivity to any single odorant type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite approach by presenting multiple different odorants (including monomolecular and polymeric odorants) in a standardized sequence. This composite stimulus set provides a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of olfactory function compared to using a single odorant type, as it accounts for variations in individual sensitivity across different odorant classes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If odor identification tests are used to assess olfactory function, then cultural and prior olfactory experiences influence the results, but this makes the tests unreliable across diverse populations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of olfactory assessmentVSAvoidadaptability to different cultural backgrounds
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the semantic identification component from traditional smell tests. Instead of asking patients to identify what they smell (which requires cultural knowledge and language), the test presents multiple odorants and asks patients to indicate which ones they detect, eliminating the influence of prior olfactory experiences and cultural background while maintaining precise measurement of olfactory function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach to smell testing. Rather than presenting a single odor and asking for identification (top-down approach requiring semantic knowledge), it presents multiple odors and asks which ones are detected (bottom-up approach relying on pure sensory detection), thereby eliminating cultural and linguistic biases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If self-reporting is used to diagnose olfactory dysfunction, then the method is simple and quick, but self-reporting is notoriously unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of diagnosisVSAvoidreliability of diagnosis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-administration of the olfactory test while maintaining reliability. Patients independently present the test odorants and record which ones they detect without requiring clinician intervention during the actual testing process. This self-service approach maintains speed and simplicity while the standardized multiple-odorant protocol ensures reliable objective results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates immediate feedback mechanisms where patients record their detection responses for each odorant presentation, and the system provides structured guidance through the testing sequence. This structured feedback loop ensures accurate data collection while maintaining the efficiency of self-administration, producing reliable diagnostic results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250344991A1Compositions and methods for a universal clinical test for olfactory dysfunction
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 THE ROCKEFELLER UNIV
  • US20250344991A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344991A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344991A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are compositions and methods for measuring olfactory sensitivity, olfactory resolution, and combinations thereof. Such measurements can be made during a single test, or over consecutive tests, which may be performed during a single testing period, such as in a single day, or over a series of testing periods. The tests may be performed by a health care professional, or may be conveniently self-administered by the user.