Oligonucleotide ML Screening for Pharmacology and Tissue Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional drug discovery processes for oligonucleotide-based medicines (OBMs) are inefficient, resource-intensive, and prone to late-stage failures due to the inability to predict pharmacology and limited tissue targeting, leading to high costs and low success rates in developing safe and effective OBMs.

Innovation Solution

A machine-learned model is used to design and test OBMs in silico, mapping oligonucleotide sequences to biophysical effects, enabling the generation of refined sets of OBMs that accurately predict pharmacology and target specific tissues or cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional trial-and-error screening is used to identify OBMs, then OBMs can be found with desirable pharmacology, but the process is resource-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepharmacology prediction accuracyVSAvoidtime for drug discovery
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary prediction of OBM pharmacology before experimental screening. The model is trained on existing OBM data to predict biophysical effects, allowing researchers to identify promising candidates in silico before wet lab testing, thereby reducing time and resources spent on ineffective screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error screening process with a computational machine learning system. The ML model substitutes for manual experimental screening by automatically predicting OBM pharmacology based on input sequences, enabling rapid virtual screening without physical laboratory intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional trial-and-error screening is used to identify OBMs, then OBMs can be found with desirable pharmacology, but the process is expensive and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepharmacology prediction accuracyVSAvoidresources consumed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model creates a virtual copy of the OBM screening process. Instead of physically testing every possible OBM sequence in the laboratory, the model generates a computational representation that predicts pharmacology, allowing virtual screening of numerous candidates without consuming physical resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The model performs preliminary filtering of OBM candidates through computational prediction before actual experimental testing. This preliminary action identifies the most promising candidates, reducing the quantity of resources needed for subsequent experimental screening and development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If OBMs are designed without machine learning guidance, then design flexibility is maintained, but late-stage failures occur frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoiddevelopment success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model provides feedback on predicted pharmacology and biophysical effects during the OBM design process. Researchers can iterate on sequences based on model predictions, adjusting designs to improve predicted performance while maintaining flexibility in exploring different molecular configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The model performs preliminary assessment of OBM candidates before final selection. By predicting pharmacology and potential issues in advance, the model enables early correction of design flaws, reducing late-stage failures while preserving the ability to explore diverse molecular designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If OBMs are delivered systemically, then broad tissue coverage is achieved, but targeting precision for specific tissues is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue coverageVSAvoidtissue targeting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing OBMs with tissue-specific characteristics. The machine learning model identifies sequence features associated with specific tissue targeting, allowing customization of OBM properties to preferentially accumulate in desired tissues while minimizing off-target effects, thus achieving both coverage and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the time and cost of developing OBMs by predicting their biophysical effects with high certainty, allowing for precise targeting and improved safety and efficacy across various tissues and cell types.

Implementation Method 1

Oligonucleotide-based medicine can be designed and tested in silico using a machine-learned model trained on data representative of OBM structure, pharmacology, and effectiveness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMachine learning:

Implementation Method 2

OBMs are designed to engage with native DNA or RNA sequences in the cell by Watson Crick hybridization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWatson Crick hybridization:

Data Source

PatentUS20260024621A1Oligonucleotide-based machine learning
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 CREYON BIO INC
  • US20260024621A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024621A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024621A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine-learned model can be trained on and applied to oligonucleotide data. The machine-learned model can be, for example, a neural network, a random forest classifier, or a regression model, and can be trained in one or more stages. The machine-learned model can be applied in design settings, for instance by being configured to predict biophysical effects corresponding to oligonucleotides, by processing real-world experimental or laboratory data, and by retraining the machine-learned model in response to the processed data.