Optical Line Terminal Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bandwidth allocation methods in Passive Optical Networks (PONs) face inefficiencies due to the inability to effectively balance bandwidth efficiency and latency, often resulting in over- or under-allocation of bandwidth.

Innovation Solution

An optical line terminal (OLT) is equipped with a processor and memory configured to determine the relationship between bandwidth efficiency and latency for communication between an optical network unit (ONU) and the OLT, and to schedule bursts based on this relationship.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If bandwidth allocation is increased to reduce latency, then latency is improved, but bandwidth efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidbandwidth efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic bandwidth allocation where the OLT continuously monitors queue buffer status and adjusts burst parameters in real-time. The system transitions from static to dynamic allocation, allowing bandwidth to be flexibly adjusted based on actual traffic conditions, thereby optimizing the trade-off between latency and bandwidth efficiency without continuous over-allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the OLT receives buffer status reports from ONUs and uses this information to adjust subsequent bandwidth allocations. The relationship determination between bandwidth efficiency and latency creates a feedback loop that enables the system to learn from past allocations and optimize future allocations, resolving the contradiction by adapting to actual network conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If bandwidth allocation is decreased to improve bandwidth efficiency, then bandwidth efficiency is improved, but latency worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth efficiencyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of bandwidth allocation by determining optimal burst schedules based on the relationship between bandwidth efficiency and latency. Instead of using fixed allocation parameters, the system dynamically adjusts burst timing, duration, and size parameters to achieve optimal performance, improving bandwidth efficiency while maintaining acceptable latency through precise parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by allocating bandwidth only when and where needed based on actual queue buffer status. Rather than continuously allocating maximum bandwidth, the system provides just enough bandwidth to maintain performance, reducing waste and improving overall bandwidth efficiency while preventing latency issues through targeted allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If static bandwidth allocation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but network performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth allocation complexityVSAvoidnetwork performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static to dynamic bandwidth allocation, where the OLT continuously monitors traffic conditions and adjusts burst schedules in real-time. This dynamic approach significantly improves network performance by adapting to changing traffic patterns, while the automation of this process prevents excessive complexity from manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If dynamic bandwidth allocation is implemented, then network performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoidbandwidth allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated bandwidth allocation where the OLT autonomously monitors queue buffer status, determines the bandwidth efficiency-latency relationship, and adjusts burst schedules without external intervention. This automation improves network performance while managing complexity by embedding the decision-making logic within the network equipment itself, eliminating the need for complex external control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12317013B2Bandwidth allocation
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US12317013B2 patent drawing
  • US12317013B2 patent drawing
  • US12317013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical line terminal is disclosed. The optical line terminal comprises at least one processor; and at least one memory including machine-readable instructions. The at least one memory and the machine-readable instructions are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the optical line terminal to determine based on one or more variables a relationship between bandwidth efficiency and latency for communication of contents of a queue buffer of an optical network unit with the optical line terminal via an optical distribution network, and determine a burst schedule for the queue buffer based on the determined relationship.