Omni-Wheel Machine Tool for Non-Rectilinear Surface Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine tools face challenges in creating non-rectilinear shapes, pose safety hazards, require multiple machines for different operations, have limited size constraints, high complexity and costs, and demand advanced operator knowledge and programming skills.

Innovation Solution

A compact machine tool with omni-wheels and a control unit that allows direct contact with the workpiece for precise movement and machining, enabling operation on any size surface with reduced complexity and cost, and allowing for manual operation with enhanced safety features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional machine tools are used for non-rectilinear shaping, then the operator must have high dexterity and experience, but this increases the difficulty of operation and safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-rectilinear shaping capabilityVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated robotic system equipped with a control unit that receives positioning signals to automatically position the removal tool relative to the workpiece, eliminating the need for operator dexterity and experience in manual manipulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs automatic positioning and machining operations through the robotic mechanism and control unit, making the system self-sufficient without requiring continuous manual intervention or high-level operator skills

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If CNC machines are used to automate machining, then productivity and precision improve, but device complexity and purchase costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated machining capabilityVSAvoidmachine structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the machining system into modular components: a robotic mechanism for positioning, a removal tool, and a control unit, allowing for simpler individual parts that can be independently selected and replaced without requiring a complete complex CNC system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic mechanism is designed to perform multiple machining operations by changing the removal tool, eliminating the need for multiple specialized machines and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If CNC machines with protective shells are used, then operator safety improves, but the size of workpieces is limited by the processing chamber

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidworkpiece size limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic robotic system that can move freely around and on the workpiece rather than being constrained within a fixed processing chamber, allowing the workpiece size to be limited only by the robotic system's travel range rather than a rigid enclosure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic mechanism serves as an intermediary between the operator and the workpiece, allowing the operator to remain at a safe distance while the robot performs the hazardous machining operations, eliminating the need for a confining protective shell

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machine tools are used for different machining operations, then versatility improves, but purchase costs and processing times increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining operation varietyVSAvoidprocessing time between operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal robotic system that can perform multiple machining operations (cutting, drilling, shaping) by changing the removal tool, allowing all operations to be performed on a single platform without moving the workpiece between different machines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple machining functions into a single integrated robotic system, merging the capabilities of what would traditionally require separate machines into one unified platform that can perform all operations in sequence without moving the workpiece

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11253967B2Machine tool
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 SPRINGA SRL
  • US11253967B2 patent drawing
  • US11253967B2 patent drawing
  • US11253967B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a machine tool configured for machining by removing material from an object defining a machining surface and including a removal tool of material from the object and driving means configured to be placed directly in contact with the machining surface and to move said machine tool and, thus, the removal tool, with respect to the object.