OMT Frame with Elastic Fastening for Stress-Free Antenna Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing orthogonal mode transducers (OMTs) attached to antennas face mechanical stress and weight optimization challenges due to external forces, affecting their functionality in combining and separating radio frequency signals.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a frame and antenna interface device featuring elastically deformable fastening sections and a waveguide for secure, stress-free attachment of the OMT to the antenna, allowing for weight optimization and efficient RF signal processing while minimizing mechanical stress on the OMT.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the OMT is directly attached to the antenna, then the mechanical structure is simple, but the OMT is exposed to external mechanical forces and stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical structureVSAvoidmechanical stress on OMT
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A frame structure is introduced as an intermediary component between the antenna and the OMT. The frame includes a supporting surface for the antenna interface device and a receiving section for the OMT, creating a mechanical decoupling that prevents external forces from being transmitted to the OMT while maintaining structural connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting structure is segmented into distinct functional sections: the antenna interface device with supporting surface, the frame structure with receiving section, and the OMT mounting section. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, with the frame acting as a force-isolating intermediary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the OMT design is optimized for RF signal processing, then the signal processing capability is improved, but the weight optimization is limited due to mechanical strength requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRF signal processing capabilityVSAvoidOMT weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure serves as a mechanical intermediary that assumes the load-bearing function, allowing the OMT to be designed with minimal weight for optimal RF performance. The frame's structural strength compensates for the reduced weight of the OMT, maintaining overall system integrity while enabling weight optimization of the critical RF component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If fastening sections are made rigid for secure attachment, then the mechanical stability is improved, but mechanical tolerances and alignment precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening sections incorporate elastically deformable zones that change their mechanical parameters under load. These zones provide initial rigidity for stable attachment but allow controlled deformation to compensate for manufacturing tolerances, enabling both mechanical stability and alignment precision to be achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fastening sections include elastically deformable zones with C-shaped cross-sections that function as flexible elements. These zones can deform elastically to accommodate tolerance variations in the antenna and OMT interfaces while maintaining secure attachment, resolving the contradiction between rigidity and tolerance compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the frame is designed to isolate the OMT from external forces, then the OMT is protected from stress, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stress protectionVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure performs multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical support for both the antenna interface device and the OMT, isolates the OMT from external forces, and enables weight optimization of the OMT. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional component, the overall device complexity is minimized while achieving stress protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables a stress-free attachment of the OMT, optimizing its RF signal processing capabilities and reducing weight, ensuring efficient signal combination and separation with improved mechanical stability and alignment.

Implementation Method 1

at least one of said two fastening sections comprises an elastically deformable zone. This enables to temporarily deform said elastically deformable zone thus providing a restoring force to the frame or e.g. the antenna interface device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3734762B1Apparatus for attaching an orthogonal mode transducer to an antenna
Publication Date: 2023.04.19 ALCATEL LUCENT SHANGHAI BELL CO LTD
  • EP3734762B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3734762B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4B
  • EP3734762B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6A

AI summary

Apparatus for attaching an orthogonal mode transducer, OMT, to an antenna, wherein said apparatus comprises a frame for receiving said OMT, and an antenna interface device for establishing a radio frequency, RF, signal connection between said OMT and said antenna, wherein said frame comprises a supporting surface for releasably attaching said antenna interface device to said frame.