One-Class Model for Electrical System Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical systems face challenges in continuous condition monitoring and anomaly detection, often only identifying anomalies during routine maintenance, leading to reactive repairs and potential system downtime due to unpredictable anomaly behavior.

Innovation Solution

A method for continuous condition monitoring using a trained one-class model to analyze sensor data from electrical systems, calculating an anomaly score based on deviations from normal state features, allowing for proactive troubleshooting and early warning systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If routine maintenance is used for anomaly detection, then system operation continues uninterrupted, but anomalies are detected too late leading to reactive repairs and downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem availabilityVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously monitoring electrical parameters and learning the normal state behavior pattern before anomalies occur. The one-class model is trained during a training phase to establish a baseline of normal operation, enabling early detection of deviations before they lead to failures or downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing current electrical parameters against the learned normal state model and generating anomaly scores. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows operators to respond to anomalies in real-time rather than waiting for routine maintenance intervals, reducing downtime while maintaining system availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then system operation is maintained, but anomaly detection is delayed until routine maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidanomaly detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary - the one-class machine learning model - that mediates between raw electrical parameters and anomaly detection. This model learns the complex normal state patterns and serves as an intelligent intermediary to detect subtle anomalies that traditional monitoring methods would miss, improving productivity while preserving anomaly detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical/routine monitoring methods with an intelligent software-based monitoring approach. Instead of relying on periodic physical inspections, the system uses machine learning algorithms to continuously analyze electrical parameters, enabling real-time anomaly detection that improves productivity without losing detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If complex monitoring systems are deployed to detect anomalies early, then detection capability improves, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential electrical parameters needed for anomaly detection rather than monitoring all possible system variables. The one-class model is trained exclusively on normal state data to learn the characteristic pattern, simplifying the monitoring system while maintaining high detection precision by focusing on the most relevant features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming raw electrical measurements into a learned feature space through the machine learning model. This parameter transformation enables precise anomaly detection by comparing current state against the learned normal pattern, achieving high measurement precision while keeping the implementation relatively simple through standard machine learning techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If reactive repair approach is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity is reduced due to unplanned downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables preliminary action by detecting anomalies before they cause failures, allowing operators to plan and execute preventive maintenance during scheduled downtime rather than experiencing unplanned interruptions. This maintains relatively simple monitoring complexity while significantly improving productivity through avoided downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230115878A1Machine learning method for anomaly detection in an electrical system
Publication Date: 2023.04.13 FESTO AG & CO KG
  • US20230115878A1 patent drawing
  • US20230115878A1 patent drawing
  • US20230115878A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Continuous condition monitoring of an electrical system, and in particular for early fault detection, is provided. The condition monitoring unit is formed with an interface to a memory in which a trained normal state model is stored as a one-class model that has been trained in a training phase with normal state data and represents a normal state of the electrical system. Further, the condition monitoring unit comprises a data interface for continuously acquiring sensor data of the electrical system by means of a set of sensors, an extractor for extracting features from the acquired sensor data, a differentiator for determining deviations of the extracted features from learned features of the normal state model by means of a distance metric (e.g., Euclidean norm, sum norm, maximum norm), a scoring for calculating an anomaly score from the determined deviations, and an output unit for outputting the calculated anomaly score.