One-Pedal EV Control for Smooth Low-Speed Stopping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicle control systems face challenges in smoothly stopping the vehicle in low-speed zones using one-pedal feedback control, as the target acceleration is low, making it difficult to follow the target value and resulting in potential difficulties in stopping the vehicle smoothly.

Innovation Solution

A control device and method that combines one-pedal feedback control based on acceleration and speed to decelerate the vehicle, using both acceleration and speed-based feedback controls to achieve a smooth stop by calculating and applying a vehicle stop maintenance torque that matches the road surface resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If one-pedal feedback control based on acceleration is executed in the low speed zone, then the control system maintains simplicity, but the vehicle cannot stop smoothly because the target acceleration is too low to follow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidsmooth stop performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between acceleration-based feedback control and speed-based feedback control based on the vehicle's current speed. At higher speeds, acceleration-based control is used, while at low speeds, speed-based control takes over. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain smooth stop performance across all speed ranges without requiring a completely complex control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameter from acceleration to speed when the vehicle enters the low speed zone. By switching the feedback parameter based on the operating condition (speed threshold), the system optimizes control effectiveness for smooth stopping at low speeds while maintaining the simpler acceleration-based control at higher speeds where it performs adequately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If acceleration feedback control is used throughout the entire deceleration process, then the control logic remains consistent, but the vehicle experiences difficulty in smooth stopping at low speeds due to low target acceleration values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logic consistencyVSAvoidsmooth stop performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the feedback parameter based on the vehicle's operating speed. The transition from acceleration-based to speed-based feedback control creates a hybrid control logic that adapts to different operational phases, ensuring smooth stopping at low speeds while maintaining reasonable consistency in the overall control approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediate control strategy that bridges acceleration-based control and speed-based control. By using speed as a threshold parameter to trigger the switch between control modes, the system creates a seamless transition that maintains control logic coherence while improving smooth stop performance in the low speed zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the control system switches to speed-based feedback control at low speeds, then smooth stop performance is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth stop performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control process is segmented into distinct phases based on speed thresholds. The deceleration process is divided into a high-speed phase (using acceleration-based feedback) and a low-speed phase (using speed-based feedback). This segmentation allows each control mode to be optimized for its specific operating range while keeping the overall system manageable through clear phase boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system employs dynamic switching between two relatively simple control modes rather than implementing a single complex adaptive controller. By using a speed threshold as the switching criterion, the system achieves smooth stop performance improvement through a straightforward conditional logic structure, minimizing the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12084058B2Electric vehicle control device, control method, and control system
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 ASTEMO LTD
  • US12084058B2 patent drawing
  • US12084058B2 patent drawing
  • US12084058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control device, a control method, and a control system for an electric vehicle are configured to use both of one-pedal feedback control based on an acceleration and one-pedal feedback control based on a speed, to thereby decelerate a vehicle to stop.