Online Adaptive Multi-Sensor Fusion for 3D Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle automation systems face challenges in maintaining accurate 3D object detection due to covariate shift, where the distribution of input sensor data changes between training and inference environments, leading to decreased performance and potential catastrophic forgetting.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a statistically-driven online multi-sensor fusion model that adapts to new unseen test data by identifying covariate shift between training and test data, using domain descriptor heads to determine modification values for Bird's Eye View (BEV) features, and sampling test data to improve model robustness and inference time performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a multi-sensor fusion model is trained on training data, then it achieves accurate 3D object detection performance, but performance degrades when deployed on test data with different distribution (covariate shift)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D object detection performanceVSAvoidperformance on unseen test data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by continuously updating model parameters using online learning algorithms that process test data in real-time. The system dynamically adjusts the fusion model's parameters based on the distribution of incoming sensor data, allowing it to adapt to covariate shift and maintain accurate 3D object detection performance on unseen test data without requiring complete retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes model parameters online by updating weight matrices and bias terms using adaptive learning rates. The parameter update rules incorporate statistics from test data (such as mean and covariance matrices) to adjust the fusion model's parameters, enabling it to compensate for distribution changes between training and test data while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If sensor data is collected from diverse environments, then the system gains adaptability to different conditions, but covariate shift occurs causing degraded detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors the distribution of incoming sensor data and uses this information to adjust model parameters. The feedback loop compares test data statistics with training data characteristics and automatically modifies the fusion model to maintain optimal performance, preventing accuracy degradation despite environmental diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary adaptation by pre-computing statistical parameters (mean, covariance) from test data and using these to initialize parameter updates before full training completes. This preliminary action allows the system to quickly adapt to new environmental conditions without waiting for extensive retraining, maintaining detection accuracy while gaining environmental adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the model is updated frequently to adapt to new data, then performance on new data improves, but catastrophic forgetting of training data patterns occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance on new unseen dataVSAvoidmemory of training patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial updates by updating only specific parameters related to the current data distribution rather than all parameters simultaneously. The update mechanism selectively adjusts parameters based on the degree of covariate shift detected, using conservative update steps that adapt to new data while preserving essential training patterns, thus avoiding catastrophic forgetting while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements cushioning by incorporating regularization terms and weight decay in the parameter update process that preserve important features learned during training. The update rules include mechanisms that prevent excessive changes to critical parameters, cushioning against the loss of training patterns while still allowing adaptation to new environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20240412494A1Online adaptive multi-sensor fusion
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240412494A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412494A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412494A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides systems, methods, and devices that support image processing. In a first aspect, a method for multi-sensor fusion includes receiving first information indicative of a first set of BEV features of image data captured by an image sensor; receiving second information indicative of a second set of BEV features of non-image sensor data captured by a non-image sensor; and determining fused data that combines the image data and the non-image sensor data based on the first information, the second information, and third information indicative of differences between BEV features of training data and the first set of BEV features and the second set of BEV features. The BEV features of the training data include a third set of BEV features associated with the image sensor and a fourth set of BEV features associated with the non-image sensor. Other aspects and features are also claimed and described.