Online Joint Guarantee Server for Cross-Regional SME Credit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional joint guarantee methods are limited by being offline, restrictive in geographical scope, and lacking comprehensive risk monitoring, resulting in a low success rate and inadequate credit establishment for small/medium-sized companies.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for processing online joint guarantees that allow users to form joint guarantee groups through various selectable types, including automatic matching, fraternity, and online initiation/participation, with a centralized server managing the process and enabling online monitoring and risk control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional offline joint guarantee method is used, then the process is simple and direct, but the geographical scope is limited and success rate is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeographical scopeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary between users and banks to process joint guarantee applications. The server receives applications from users, matches them with suitable joint guarantee groups, and communicates with banks on behalf of the users, thereby expanding geographical scope while managing system complexity through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The server performs multiple functions including receiving applications, validating user information, matching users with joint guarantee groups, communicating with banks, and providing feedback. This multi-functionality enables the system to handle diverse scenarios (automatic matching, fraternity, online initiation) within a single unified platform, improving adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If bank-based matching is used, then the process is straightforward, but the success rate is greatly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccess rateVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The server performs preliminary actions by pre-validating user information, pre-matching users with suitable joint guarantee groups based on criteria, and pre-preparing application packages before submission to banks. This preliminary processing increases the success rate by ensuring applications are well-prepared and matched, while maintaining ease of operation through automated matchmaking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The server implements a feedback mechanism where it receives feedback from banks about application status and communicates this feedback to users. This feedback loop enables continuous improvement of matching accuracy and operation simplicity by learning from bank responses and adjusting the matching algorithm accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If offline monitoring mechanism is used, then the implementation is simple, but the risk control capability is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk control capabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/offline monitoring mechanism with an electronic/online monitoring system. The server automatically monitors loan status, tracks repayment behavior, and alerts relevant parties through electronic communications. This substitution significantly enhances risk control capability through continuous automated monitoring while managing complexity through standardized electronic processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of information

If inter-bank communication only is used, then the information exchange is limited, but the credit establishment benefit is unclear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accessibilityVSAvoidcredit establishment benefit
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The server serves as a universal information hub that collects, stores, and shares credit information with multiple stakeholders including users, banks, and joint guarantee groups. It provides standardized credit reports and information access to various parties, thereby improving information accessibility and establishing clear credit benefits for all participants in the ecosystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8924456B2Method and system for processing online joint guarantee
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US8924456B2 patent drawing
  • US8924456B2 patent drawing
  • US8924456B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system are disclosed for processing online joint guarantee. After a server receives an application from a user, the server provides various types of joint guarantee grouping to the user for selection. The server creates a joint guarantee group having a unique ID according to the selection of the user, organizes the information of the joint guarantee group into a data packet and sends the data packet to a bank system to be approved. The method potentially improves the success rate of joint guarantee grouping and removes the geographical limitations. Through the Internet, the method makes it possible to join companies of different geographical locations for online joint guarantee. The method also establishes a complete online alert mechanism, and realizes computerized loan risk control to improve the business credit system.