Online Learning Search Coach for Focused Research Assignments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Students often struggle with ineffective search skills, leading to low-quality research results and inefficient use of search engines, which impacts assignment completion and long-term skill development, and results in wasted time and resources.

Innovation Solution

An online learning platform with a search coach tool that guides users through the research process, allowing them to document their searches and add evaluated resources to a collection, providing context for their search queries and citations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If students use search engines to research topics, then they can access information quickly and conveniently, but they struggle to use search engines effectively resulting in low-quality search queries and poor research outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch speedVSAvoidsearch quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system between students and search engines that captures search queries, evaluates their quality, and provides real-time feedback. This intermediary layer (the search coaching platform) mediates the interaction by analyzing search terms, assessing relevance to assignment topics, and guiding students to improve query formulation without eliminating the speed benefit of search engines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where students receive immediate evaluation of their search query quality, including assessments of relevance, specificity, and effectiveness. This feedback mechanism allows students to iteratively improve their search skills while maintaining the speed advantage of using search engines, as they can quickly adjust queries based on system guidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If students repeatedly redo searches to find better results, then they may improve research quality, but they waste time and consume excessive compute resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresearch qualityVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation and guidance before students execute multiple search iterations. By providing upfront feedback on query quality and suggesting improvements, the system prevents wasteful repeated searches. Students receive direction on how to formulate better queries the first time, reducing the need for multiple retry attempts and associated time/resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables students to self-diagnose and self-correct poor search queries through automated evaluation feedback. Rather than requiring repeated trial-and-error searches or instructor intervention, students can independently identify weaknesses in their queries and improve them, reducing time loss while maintaining research quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If search engines return scattered and unfocused results, then they provide comprehensive coverage, but they fail to deliver useful information and require repeated searches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresult coverageVSAvoidresult focus
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between search engines and students that evaluates result quality and guides students toward focused, relevant information. This intermediary system analyzes search results for relevance to assignment topics, identifies key information, and helps students filter out scattered or irrelevant results while maintaining comprehensive coverage of important concepts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different evaluation criteria to different aspects of search results. Rather than treating all results uniformly, it assesses local qualities such as relevance to specific assignment requirements, credibility of sources, and depth of information. This localized quality assessment helps students identify and focus on the most useful information while maintaining broad coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250217426A1Online learning platforms with enhanced search assignments
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20250217426A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217426A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217426A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing device executing software displays a view of a search assignment in a user interface to a learning platform. The device receives user input comprising search terms associated with the search assignment, and generates queries based on the user input. The device submits the queries to a search engine, whereupon the search engine performs searches based on the queries, and the device displays the results. As a user evaluates resources provided in the results, the device updates the user interface to include an option selectable for adding evaluated ones of the resources to a collection of resources for the search assignment. In response to the user selecting the option with respect to a resource of the evaluated ones of the resources, the device adds the resource to the collection of resources.