Online Machine Learning Engine for Adaptive Cache Decision Making

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High QPS servers rely on heuristic techniques for decision-making, which are efficient but lack accuracy and adaptability, becoming less effective over time due to changing usage patterns and requiring significant computational resources.

Innovation Solution

Integration of an efficient and lightweight online machine learning engine that uses reinforcement learning to generate predictions and update a machine-learning model based on feedback, replacing or augmenting existing heuristics for decisions such as cache management, allowing for continuous adaptation and improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If heuristic techniques are used for decision-making in high QPS servers, then decision-making efficiency is improved, but accuracy and adaptability deteriorate over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making efficiencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual outcome of cache decisions (cache hit or miss) is fed back to the machine learning model. This allows the model to learn from past decisions and continuously improve its prediction accuracy, resolving the contradiction between using heuristics for speed and needing accuracy for effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static heuristics to dynamic machine learning models that adapt to changing usage patterns over time. The model continuously learns from new data and updates its predictions, maintaining high accuracy while the system handles high QPS workloads through efficient online learning techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If heuristic techniques are used for cache management decisions, then computational resource consumption is reduced, but adaptability to changing usage patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource consumptionVSAvoidadaptability to changing usage patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback loop provides the machine learning model with information about actual cache performance, enabling it to adapt to changing usage patterns. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from real-world behavior and adjust its predictions, maintaining adaptability while using computational resources efficiently through online learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs self-learning and self-updating using feedback from cache operations. This self-service capability allows the system to automatically adapt to changing patterns without external intervention, maintaining adaptability while minimizing the need for complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If existing heuristics are used for server decisions, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but effectiveness over time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoiddecision effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism enables the machine learning model to continuously improve its decision effectiveness by learning from actual outcomes. This maintains reliability over time while the model handles the complexity internally, presenting a simple interface to the rest of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/heuristic decision-making system with a machine learning-based system. This substitution maintains implementation simplicity from the user perspective while dramatically improving reliability and adaptability through intelligent learning algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11568271B1Machine learning in resource-constrained environments
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 META PLATFORMS INC
  • US11568271B1 patent drawing
  • US11568271B1 patent drawing
  • US11568271B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method includes receiving a request to determine whether to perform an action, wherein the action is based on one or more feature values, generating a prediction of whether to perform the action, wherein the prediction is generated using a machine-learning model that is trained based on the feature values, a heuristic value based on the feature values, and one or more feedback scores based on corresponding past predictions generated by the machine-learning model, where the heuristic value indicates whether to perform the action based on one or more predetermined conditions that are based on the feature values, performing the action when the prediction indicates that the action is to be performed, receiving a feedback score that indicates a level of effectiveness of the prediction, and updating the machine-learning model based on the feedback score, the feature values, and the heuristic value.