Online Submittal Exchange System for Construction Document Tracking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The construction industry faces inefficiencies in the review and management of construction submittals due to the cumbersome handling of paper documents and lack of centralized tracking systems, with existing solutions failing to address the specific rules and controls required by architects for managing submittals effectively.
Innovation Solution
A system and method for facilitating the exchange and review of construction submittals through a central hub that provides access levels for contractors, architects, and consultants, allowing for electronic submission, tracking, and management of all submittals, including paper and physical samples, with features like automated email notifications, customizable review codes, and a structured log format for tracking status and actions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If paper documents and hardcopies are used for submittal review, then the process follows traditional industry conventions, but the cost of materials, shipping and time increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The system creates electronic copies of submittal documents that can be distributed and reviewed digitally, replacing physical paper copies. This eliminates shipping time and material costs while maintaining document accessibility and review capabilities through digital replication.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical paper-based document handling system with an electronic digital system. Physical shipping, manual routing, and paper storage are substituted with electronic transmission, automated routing algorithms, and digital archiving, dramatically reducing processing time.
2Loss of information
If a centralized tracking system is implemented, then submittal status and review progress can be monitored efficiently, but the system complexity and rules to manage increase
Solution Approach 1:
The centralized tracking system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors submittal status, tracks review progress, manages document versions, notifies stakeholders, and maintains audit trails. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into one unified platform.
Solution Approach 2:
The system automatically performs tracking and monitoring functions without requiring manual intervention. Status updates are generated automatically when submittals are submitted or reviewed, notifications are sent automatically to relevant parties, and the tracking log maintains itself through automated data capture from system activities.
3Loss of energy
If electronic submittal system is used, then shipping and material costs are reduced, but the ability to control review process and prevent unauthorized viewing is compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements different access rights and control levels for different users and document states. Architects have full control to restrict viewing until review completion, while consultants and contractors have appropriate limited access. This localized control approach maintains security and process integrity while enabling electronic efficiency.
Solution Approach 2:
The system pre-configures access controls and review permissions before submittals are submitted. Architects can set rules in advance about who can view documents and under what conditions, ensuring that control mechanisms are in place before any potential unauthorized access could occur.
Data Source
AI summary
A method and system is provided for facilitating exchange and review of electronically submitted construction submittals. The method and system also provide for management and review of construction submittals associated with a construction project. The method and system provides convenience and reduces expenses for architects, contractors and consultants involved in a construction process. The method includes providing an application adapted to provide a first level of access to a contractor to submit construction submittals, a second level of access to an architect to review and manage construction submittals, a third level of access to consultants to review construction submittals, and a fourth level of access to facilities owners, construction managers, and other parties to monitor the submittal process. The application is adapted to display the status, review dates, actions, and other relevant information of all project submittals, whether electronic, paper, or physical samples, in a linear log format.