Ontogenesis Engine for Dynamic Context Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cognitive engines require re-training with new data, have limited context sensitivity, and provide inadequate temporal context, making them inefficient for dynamic data processing and decision-making in computer systems.

Innovation Solution

The system collects information to perform automated ontogenesis operations, determining context, simulating actions, and calculating confidence levels to optimize computer system operations by identifying the best simulation results and applying them to control and performance optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional cognitive engines use pre-defined rules from static models, then they provide quantitative analysis capability, but they require re-training each time new data is input and have limited context sensitivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new dataVSAvoidtime for re-training
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static models into dynamic models that continuously evolve and adapt to new data in real-time. The cognitive engine uses dynamic modeling to automatically update its understanding of system behavior without requiring manual re-training, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated ontogenesis operations where the cognitive engine autonomously learns from new data, performs self-updating of models, and continuously improves its context sensitivity without external intervention or manual re-training processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If conventional cognitive engines provide quantitative analysis, then they offer analytical capability, but they provide little temporal context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal context informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces temporal dimension to the analysis by implementing time-series modeling and historical data integration. This adds the missing temporal context dimension to the quantitative analysis without fundamentally increasing system complexity, as the temporal analysis builds upon existing quantitative frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If the system performs comprehensive simulation of multiple action sets, then it improves decision accuracy through confidence values, but it increases computational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision confidence accuracyVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively simulating only the most promising action sets based on preliminary evaluation criteria. Instead of exhaustively simulating all possible actions, it focuses computational resources on a subset of high-potential scenarios, maintaining decision confidence accuracy while reducing overall simulation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11088921B2Systems and method for providing an ontogenesis emergence and confidence engine
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 EAGLE TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US11088921B2 patent drawing
  • US11088921B2 patent drawing
  • US11088921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling operations of a Computer System (“CS”). The methods comprise: collecting information about events occurring in CS; performing automated ontogenesis operations using the collected information to determine a context of a given situation associated with CS using stored ontogenetic knowledge, define parameters for different sets of actions that could occur in the context of the given situation, simulate the sets of actions to generate a set of simulation results defining predicted consequences resulting from performance of behaviors by nodes, determine a confidence value for each simulation result that indicates a level of confidence that a successful outcome will result if action(s) associated with the simulation result are performed by CS, and analyze the confidence values to identify a simulation result with the best confidence level; and using the parameters associated with the best simulation result to control and optimize performance of CS.