Optical Phased Array Phase Calibration via Segmented Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical phased arrays (OPAs) face challenges in achieving precise and efficient beam forming and beam steering due to random phase differences in waveguides caused by process errors and environmental factors, leading to inefficiencies in phase control and increased complexity with the number of channels.

Innovation Solution

A phase optimization method combining genetic algorithm and local optimization techniques, such as step scan and hill climb methods, is employed to correct phase differences in OPAs, allowing for rapid and high-quality phase profiling and beam steering by applying phase gradients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single phase optimization method is used, then the optimization process is simple, but the beam forming quality and steering precision are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam forming qualityVSAvoidoptimization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The phase optimization process is divided into two distinct stages: first phase optimization using a first optimization method to obtain initial phase values, and second phase optimization using a second optimization method to refine these values. This segmentation allows each method to specialize in different aspects of optimization, achieving high beam forming quality without requiring a single overly complex method

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first phase optimization serves as a preliminary action that provides initial phase values before the second phase optimization begins. This preliminary optimization prepares the system by establishing a baseline phase configuration, which then allows the second optimization method to focus on fine-tuning and achieving precise beam steering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive phase calibration is performed for all channels, then phase accuracy is improved, but the calibration time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The first optimization method performs a preliminary phase calibration that establishes initial phase values for all channels quickly. This preliminary action covers all channels to ensure comprehensive phase accuracy, while the second optimization method then efficiently refines these values, reducing the total calibration time compared to performing a single comprehensive optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process is segmented into two phases: initial calibration using the first optimization method and refined calibration using the second optimization method. This segmentation allows the system to achieve comprehensive phase accuracy across all channels while minimizing total calibration time by distributing the workload across two specialized optimization stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the number of waveguide channels is increased, then the beam steering capability is improved, but the phase control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam steering capabilityVSAvoidphase control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The phase control for multiple waveguide channels is divided into two optimization stages: first phase optimization that handles the broad phase alignment across all channels, and second phase optimization that refines the phase control for precise beam steering. This segmentation makes phase control manageable even as the number of channels increases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first optimization method performs a preliminary phase alignment across all waveguide channels, establishing a foundation for subsequent refined optimization. This preliminary action simplifies the overall phase control task by pre-establishing phase relationships, making it easier to manage complexity as channel count increases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11022857B2Method of optimizing phase of optical phased array
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11022857B2 patent drawing
  • US11022857B2 patent drawing
  • US11022857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of phase optimization of an optical phased array (OPA) includes: performing a phase optimization in a beam forming process with respect to a single focal point, wherein the performing the phase optimization in the beam forming process may include: performing a first phase optimization in a first method to obtain a first beam phase profile; and performing a second phase optimization on the first beam phase profile in a second method that is different form the first method.