Open-Cell Foam Contaminant Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for testing water and air for contaminants, such as grab sampling, are inadequate for detecting transient and low-concentration contaminants and fail to accurately represent exposure over time, especially in non-equilibrium water systems, and existing semi-permeable membrane devices are costly and ineffective for high molecular weight contaminants.

Innovation Solution

An open-cell foam matrix material, preferably composed of a copolymer of ethylene and alkyl acrylate, is used to accumulate contaminants over time, maximizing surface area for absorption and adsorption of oils and chemicals while repelling water, allowing for more accurate and cost-effective detection of a wide range of contaminants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If semi-permeable membrane (SPMD) non open-cell foam sampling is used, then the ability to concentrate contaminants over extended time period is improved, but the cost increases and absorption of high molecular weight contaminants is reduced or eliminated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant concentration detectionVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs open-cell foam materials with controlled porosity to enable contaminant absorption. The open-cell structure allows contaminants to penetrate and accumulate within the foam matrix, providing effective sampling while using cost-effective materials rather than expensive semi-permeable membranes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite foam materials comprising multiple polymers (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene) with specific properties. These composite materials are engineered to balance absorption capacity for high molecular weight contaminants, structural integrity, and cost-effectiveness, resolving the contradiction between detection precision and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If grab sampling is used, then the sampling process is simple and instantaneous, but the ability to detect transient and low-concentration contaminants is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling simplicityVSAvoidcontaminant detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The foam sampling devices are deployed in advance and left in the water environment for extended periods (days to weeks) to pre-accumulate contaminants. This preliminary action allows transient and low-concentration contaminants to build up to detectable levels before the device is retrieved for analysis, maintaining simplicity while improving detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The foam devices continuously accumulate contaminants over the deployment period, providing ongoing sampling action rather than a single instantaneous measurement. This continuous accumulation process ensures that transient contaminants are captured and concentrated, improving detection precision while keeping the operation simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of time

If grab sampling is used, then the sampling reflects instantaneous conditions, but it fails to represent exposure over time in non-equilibrium water systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling timeVSAvoidexposure representation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The foam sampling devices are deployed for extended periods (excessive time compared to instantaneous sampling) to capture contaminant accumulation over time. This excessive exposure time ensures that the sampling represents average exposure conditions rather than transient instantaneous values, providing better information about actual exposure while accepting longer deployment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Duration of action of moving object

If SPMD devices are used for monitoring, then the sampling extends over time, but the detection of high molecular weight contaminants becomes difficult and cost prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling durationVSAvoidhigh molecular weight contaminant detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The open-cell foam structure provides larger pore sizes and higher porosity compared to semi-permeable membranes, enabling effective absorption and accumulation of high molecular weight contaminants. The porous structure allows these larger molecules to penetrate and reside within the foam matrix, making them detectable after extended sampling periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key material parameters including foam porosity, cell size, and polymer composition to optimize absorption of high molecular weight contaminants. By adjusting these parameters, the device maintains effective sampling duration while improving detection capability for larger molecules that are difficult to detect with traditional SPMD devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The open-cell foam matrix provides a more accurate representation of contaminant exposure over time, reducing variability and detecting contaminants that may be undetectable with traditional methods, including high molecular weight substances, and can be used in various water bodies and environments.

Implementation Method 1

The open-cell structure behaves as the alveoli of the human lungs in that it maximizes surface area which maximizes the efficacy of the open-cell foam's ability to attract oil, chemicals, and related contamination at the molecular level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

The open-cell structure behaves as the alveoli of the human lungs in that it maximizes surface area which maximizes the efficacy of the open-cell foam's ability to attract oil, chemicals, and related contamination at the molecular level, while repelling water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic effect: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentEP3167268B1A method of removing and detecting the presence of substances.
Publication Date: 2024.02.21 SMITH SCOTT C
  • EP3167268B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of removing and detecting the presence of substances from at least one of a body of water (20) and the air. The method includes placing into the body of water (20) or into the air an open-cell foam material (12, 14, 16), removing separate portions of the open-cell foam material (12, 14, 16) from the water (20) or air at different exposure times after the open-cell foam material (12, 14, 16) was placed into the water (20) or air, and determining the presence in the removed separate portions of one or more substances that were removed from the water (20) or air by the open-cell foam material (12, 14, 16).