Open-Cell Internal Structure Generation for Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current FFF 3D printing techniques face limitations in creating internal structures that provide sufficient strength and stability, especially in overhangs and top surfaces, due to constrained infill patterns and environmental pressure conditions.

Innovation Solution

A pressure-controlled enclosure system in conjunction with computer-aided methods for generating open-cell and closed-cell internal structures, allowing adjustable pressure levels and customizable infill patterns to enhance structural properties and reduce material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional infill patterns are used in FFF 3D printing, then the printing process is simple and fast, but the structural strength and stability of the printed object are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidinfill pattern complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The infill structure is segmented into a hierarchical system comprising primary infill patterns (grid, triangular, hexagonal) and secondary reinforcement structures (cross-hatching, concentric circles, radial patterns). This segmentation allows each layer to provide specific structural functions, with the primary infill providing base strength and secondary patterns adding targeted reinforcement, thereby achieving high structural strength through organized complexity rather than random densification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional infill patterns to three-dimensional multi-layer structures by stacking multiple infill layers with varying patterns and orientations. Each layer is positioned at different heights and angles, creating a volumetric reinforcement network that significantly enhances structural strength while maintaining reasonable complexity through systematic layering rather than chaotic material addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If dense infill patterns are used to improve strength, then structural stability increases, but material consumption and printing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different infill patterns and densities are applied to different regions of the printed object based on local structural requirements. High-strength cross-hatching and concentric patterns are concentrated in load-bearing areas and critical joints, while lighter grid patterns are used in non-critical regions. This localized quality optimization achieves overall structural stability while minimizing total material consumption by avoiding uniform over-engineering throughout the entire object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying dense infill uniformly throughout the entire object, the patent uses partial dense infill only where structurally necessary. Critical load paths and stress concentration zones receive enhanced reinforcement with higher density patterns, while peripheral and low-stress areas use sparser infill. This partial action approach achieves sufficient structural stability without the excessive material consumption that would result from uniform dense infill across the entire object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Strength

If uniform infill density is used throughout the object, then manufacturing is simple, but structural efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural efficiencyVSAvoidinfill generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The infill generation system dynamically adapts pattern selection and density parameters based on real-time analysis of the object's geometry and expected load conditions. The system automatically identifies critical regions requiring reinforcement and adjusts infill patterns accordingly, transitioning from static uniform infill to dynamic variable infill. This dynamic approach achieves high structural efficiency through context-aware pattern distribution while managing manufacturing complexity through automated algorithmic generation rather than manual design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies multiple infill parameters including pattern type (grid, triangular, hexagonal, cross-hatch), infill density (10-100%), layer thickness, and orientation angles across different regions and layers of the object. These parameter changes are coordinated to optimize structural efficiency for specific loading conditions while the slicing software manages the complexity of generating and coordinating these varied parameters throughout the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10556418B2Systems and methods of open-cell internal structure and closed-cell internal structure generation for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 AUTODESK INC
  • US10556418B2 patent drawing
  • US10556418B2 patent drawing
  • US10556418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems, including medium-encoded computer program products, for generating internal structures usable in additive manufacturing include: obtaining a three-dimensional (3D) model of an object to be created by a 3D printer; determining a first slice of the 3D model; and generating first slice data that represents a portion of an internal structure in the first slice of the 3D model of the object, the slice data being usable for fabricating the first slice of the object during a 3D printing process, wherein the portion of the internal structure (i) includes cell structures corresponding to a respective point of a plurality of points with corresponding locations within the interior region, wherein each of the cell structures include an empty space inside the cell structure and (ii) includes a determined quantity of the cell structures based on an analysis of the 3D model.