Open RAN Distributed Unit Failure Prediction and Graceful Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radio access networks face challenges in predicting and proactively addressing failures of distributed units, leading to dropped calls and inefficient maintenance procedures, particularly in 5G networks with heterogeneous vendor components.

Innovation Solution

Implementing machine learning models that analyze telemetry data to predict failures and perform graceful shutdowns or upgrades, minimizing service interruptions by intelligently handing over calls and automating maintenance processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning models are built from telemetry data to predict failures, then failure prediction accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically builds and updates machine learning models using telemetry data without requiring manual intervention. The model self-improves by continuously learning from new failure patterns and network conditions, reducing the need for complex manual data processing and model training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where predicted failures are monitored and actual outcomes are fed back into the machine learning model. This continuous feedback mechanism refines prediction accuracy over time while automating the data processing complexity through systematic learning from historical failure data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If graceful shutdown procedures are implemented to hand over calls, then service continuity is improved, but shutdown process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidshutdown process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting failures before they occur and pre-planning graceful shutdown procedures. The handover process is initiated in advance, allowing the system to prepare alternative routing paths and notify relevant parties before the actual shutdown, thereby simplifying the execution of service continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary coordination mechanism that manages the handover process between distributed units. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of coordinated shutdowns from individual components, enabling service continuity through automated mediation between multiple system elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If proactive remedial actions are taken to address predicted failures, then network reliability is improved, but response time requirements increase complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system takes preliminary remedial actions based on predicted failures before actual outages occur. By anticipating potential issues and executing preventive measures in advance, the system eliminates the need for reactive responses under time pressure, thereby simplifying the response time requirements while maintaining high network reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips unnecessary diagnostic steps by using machine learning predictions to directly identify required remedial actions. Instead of performing comprehensive troubleshooting when failures occur, the system rushes through to the solution by leveraging pre-computed failure patterns and predicted root causes, thereby reducing response time complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Measurement precision

If continuous telemetry data streaming is implemented, then failure detection accuracy is improved, but data volume and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical telemetry data points relevant to failure detection from the continuous data stream. By filtering and selecting only essential parameters such as CPU usage thresholds, memory errors, and connection anomalies, the system maintains high failure detection accuracy while significantly reducing the volume of data requiring processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to dynamically adjust data collection intensity based on network conditions. When the network is stable, data streaming is reduced; when anomalies are detected, data collection intensity increases. This feedback-driven approach maintains failure detection accuracy while minimizing unnecessary data processing load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12621685B2Open radio access network maintenance applications
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO LLC
  • US12621685B2 patent drawing
  • US12621685B2 patent drawing
  • US12621685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A disclosed method may include (i) building, based on telemetry data from an open radio access network, a machine learning model that predicts when a candidate distributed unit within the open radio access network will experience a failure, (ii) detect, by applying the machine learning model that predicts when the candidate distributed unit will shut down, that a specific distributed unit will experience a specific failure, and (iii) perform, in response to detecting that the specific distributed unit will experience the specific failure, a remedial action that addresses the specific failure. Related systems and computer-readable mediums are further disclosed.