Open RAN CU-UP Dynamic Scaling Without Load Balancers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing OpenRAN architectures face challenges in dynamically scaling user plane throughput to accommodate peak and non-peak hours, leading to potential service disruptions and resource inefficiencies, especially in critical applications like emergency calls and eHealth, without impacting subscriber sessions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing CU-UP as a cloud-native network function (CNF) with intelligent dynamic scaling, allowing for pod addition/deletion without load balancer, and signaling endpoint changes to maintain service continuity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional OpenRAN CU-UP architecture is used, then service continuity can be maintained, but resource utilization is inefficient and scaling is difficult during peak and non-peak hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic scaling capabilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic scaling of CU-UP instances based on real-time traffic conditions. The system automatically adds or removes CU-UP instances (scaling from 1 to 5 pods) according to network load, enabling the architecture to adapt dynamically between peak and non-peak hours while optimizing resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting the number of active CU-UP pods based on traffic patterns. During peak hours, more pods are deployed to handle increased load, while fewer pods operate during non-peak hours, thereby optimizing resource allocation and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If manual intervention is used for CU-UP scaling, then control is simplified, but response time increases and service disruption risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaling response speedVSAvoidautomation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service scaling by automatically detecting traffic conditions and initiating pod deployment or termination without manual intervention. The controller monitors network metrics and autonomously adjusts CU-UP instance counts, achieving fast response speed while reducing operational complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors network traffic and resource usage, then adjusts CU-UP scaling decisions based on this feedback. This closed-loop control enables rapid response to changing conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If load balancer is used for CU-UP scaling, then traffic distribution is improved, but system complexity and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidscaling architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the load balancer component from the traditional scaling architecture. Instead of using a separate load balancing layer, the system directly manages pod deployment and traffic routing through the controller, simplifying the architecture while maintaining service continuity and reducing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the scaling function into discrete, manageable operations where the controller independently manages pod lifecycle and traffic routing. This segmentation eliminates the need for a centralized load balancer while maintaining reliable traffic distribution across multiple CU-UP instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If more CU-UP pods are deployed, then throughput capacity increases, but power consumption and resource waste increase during non-peak hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser plane throughputVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active CU-UP pods based on real-time traffic conditions. During peak hours, more pods are deployed to maximize throughput capacity, while during non-peak hours, the system scales down to minimal necessary pods, thereby reducing power consumption and avoiding resource waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameter of pod quantity based on network demand. The system transitions between different scaling states (1-5 pods) according to traffic patterns, optimizing the balance between throughput capacity and energy consumption by deploying resources only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260107160A1OpenRAN Intelligent Dynamic CU-UP Scaling Solution
Publication Date: 2026.04.16 PARALLEL WIRELESS INC
  • US20260107160A1 patent drawing
  • US20260107160A1 patent drawing
  • US20260107160A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is disclosed for providing Open RAN CU-UP high availability, the system comprising: at least one active CU-CP; at least one active CU-UP in communication with the at least one active CU-CP; and at least one standby CU-UP in communication with the at least one active CU-CP; wherein when a message may be received from a CU-CP that detects a failure of the at least one active CU-UP, the at least one standby CU-UP may be configured to take over and become an active CU-UP, thereby providing failover redundancy for the at least one active CU-UP.