Operation Plan Sampling for Reliable Factory Simulation Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing factory operation planning systems are prone to decision-making bias and inefficiencies due to user experience-based simulations, lacking quantified optimal operation plans and effective adaptation to changes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving multiple algorithms (Latin hypercube sampling, decision tree, and roulette wheel selection) to generate and refine operation plans through distributed simulations across computing nodes, focusing on high-potential areas to derive an optimal operation plan with increased reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If user experience-based simulation is used to derive operation plans, then decision-making can be performed, but decision-making bias occurs and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making capabilityVSAvoidoperation plan reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-evaluation by automatically assessing the potential of unobserved operation plans through algorithms, eliminating the need for user experience-based judgment and reducing decision-making bias while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces human experience-based simulation with automated algorithms (second algorithm for potential evaluation, third algorithm for weight assignment) that objectively assess operation plans, substituting mechanical human judgment with computational evaluation to improve reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive simulation is performed on all operation plans, then optimal plan accuracy improves, but simulation time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal plan identification accuracyVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different evaluation approaches to different regions of the operation plan space: observed plans are evaluated through comprehensive simulation while unobserved plans are assessed through potential evaluation algorithms, allowing focused computational resources on areas needing detailed analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The second algorithm performs preliminary evaluation of unobserved operation plans by assessing their potential before full simulation, and the third algorithm pre-assigns weights to areas based on this potential evaluation, enabling prioritized sampling that reduces overall simulation time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If number of simulation iterations is increased, then optimal operation plan accuracy improves, but computational complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal operation plan accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the sampling process by repeatedly performing simulation on additionally sampled operation plans based on weight assignments, allowing the simulation process to adapt and focus on high-potential areas rather than uniformly increasing iterations across all plans

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from potential evaluation results to guide additional sampling decisions, where the third algorithm assigns weights based on evaluated potential and the first algorithm uses these weights to determine which areas require additional sampling, creating a feedback loop that improves accuracy without uniformly increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250371459A1Operation plan derivation system and operation plan derivation method
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US20250371459A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371459A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371459A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation plan derivation method includes outputting a plurality of initial operation plans by sampling a plurality of operation plans using a first algorithm. Each of the plurality of initial operation plans has an operation factor and a judgment factor corresponding to the operation factor. A simulation is performed on the plurality of initial operation plans. An optimal operation plan is output. The performing of the simulation includes evaluating a potential of an unobserved operation plan among the plurality of operation plans using a second algorithm. A plurality of areas is defined that includes the plurality of initial operation plans based on the evaluated potential. A weight is assigned according to the evaluated potential to each of the plurality of areas using a third algorithm. The plurality of operation plans is additionally sampled depending on the assigned weight using the first algorithm.