Operation Routing Between Proximate Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of diverse mobile computing devices with varying functional capabilities poses a challenge in efficiently utilizing the best-suited device for specific operations, as users often need to transfer operations between devices to optimize performance, energy consumption, and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for operational routing between proximate devices, which involves detecting nearby devices, assessing their functional capabilities, and transferring operations based on comparative capability values and user-defined preferences to optimize performance and energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If operational transfer between devices is implemented, then operational efficiency and energy consumption are improved, but device complexity and system coordination requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem coordination requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors device proximity, functional capabilities, and operational status to dynamically determine optimal device routing. Capability values are calculated based on real-time device states, and transfer decisions are made through feedback loops that compare current operational efficiency against alternative device configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A capability value calculation mechanism serves as an intermediary that translates diverse device functionalities into comparable metrics. This intermediary layer enables standardized comparison between different devices without requiring complex direct coordination, simplifying the transfer decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If capability-based routing is implemented, then task performance optimization is improved, but measurement and assessment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask performance optimizationVSAvoidcapability assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms complex device capabilities into simplified capability values through parameter aggregation. Multiple functional attributes (processing power, memory, display quality, etc.) are converted into a single comparable metric that enables straightforward routing decisions while maintaining comprehensive device capability assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of directly comparing complex device functionalities, the system creates simplified capability value copies that represent each device's operational capacity. These copied metrics enable efficient comparison and routing decisions without requiring direct analysis of the underlying complex device specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If automatic operation transfer is implemented, then user experience is improved, but control complexity and user oversight requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs operational transfers without requiring explicit user intervention. Devices self-evaluate their capability values, compare themselves to proximate devices, and autonomously execute transfer decisions based on calculated optimization metrics, providing seamless user experience while managing complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automatic feedback loops that continuously monitor operational context and execute transfers when beneficial. This feedback mechanism handles control complexity internally through automated capability assessment and decision-making, freeing users from manual control while maintaining system optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2823396B1Methods, apparatuses, anc computer program products for operational routing between proximate devices
Publication Date: 2022.06.29 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • EP2823396B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2823396B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2823396B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products are herein provided for operational routing between proximate devices. A method may include receiving an indication that a second device is proximate a first device. The method may further include receiving an indication of at least one functional capability of the second device. The method may further include causing, by a processor, transfer of an operation from the first device to the second device based on at least one functional capability of the first device and the at least one functional capability of the second device and further based on the operation. Corresponding apparatuses and computer program products are also provided.