Automated Operator Assignment Using Historical Command Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current approaches for assigning operators to resolve IT service incidents in data centers are inefficient and prone to error, often relying on manual selection and lacking consideration of operator skills based on historical command usage.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that maps incident types to command groups and operators, using historical resolution data to determine the most suitable operator by analyzing command usage and skill sets, thereby ensuring efficient incident resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual assignment of operators to incidents is used, then flexibility in operator selection is maintained, but assignment efficiency decreases and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator selection flexibilityVSAvoidassignment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated assignment system that acts as an intermediary between incident reports and operator selection. This system uses historical data and machine learning algorithms to automatically match incidents with suitable operators, eliminating the need for manual assignment while preserving selection quality through data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing the operator assignment function without human intervention. The automated assignment engine analyzes incident characteristics, retrieves historical resolution data, and selects appropriate operators based on proven effectiveness, allowing the system to serve itself in the assignment decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual assignment of operators to incidents is used, then human judgment can be applied, but assignment accuracy decreases due to lack of skill-based matching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment accuracyVSAvoidhistorical command usage data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and storing historical incident resolution data, including commands used and their effectiveness, before new incidents occur. This historical data is structured and ready for rapid retrieval and analysis when assignment decisions need to be made, enabling accurate skill-based matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using historical data on command usage effectiveness to continuously improve assignment accuracy. The machine learning model learns from past assignments and outcomes, adjusting its selection criteria based on what has proven successful, thereby increasing reliability over time through data-driven feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated assignment based on historical data is implemented, then assignment speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the automated assignment system into distinct functional modules: incident data reception, historical data retrieval, machine learning analysis, and operator selection. This modular architecture enables the complex system to be managed through separate, manageable components that can operate independently and be maintained separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive historical data analysis is performed, then operator skill matching improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill matching precisionVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing historical data into structured formats and pre-calculating relevant metrics before they are needed for assignment decisions. Historical command usage patterns and operator skill profiles are prepared in advance, allowing rapid retrieval and comparison when new incidents require assignment, thus maintaining high precision without excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10904383B1Assigning operators to incidents
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10904383B1 patent drawing
  • US10904383B1 patent drawing
  • US10904383B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a computer program product, and a computer system assign an operator to service an incident. The method includes determining a type of incident. The method includes determining a command group based on the type of incident according to a first mapping. The first mapping is indicative of a mapping between the command group and the type of incident based on historical resolutions of historical incidents. The command group includes at least one command used in resolving the type of incident for a historical incident. The method includes determining an operator who has used the command group according to a second mapping. The second mapping is indicative of a mapping between the command group and the operator based on historical resolutions of historical incidents. The operator has used at least one command in the command group. The method includes assigning the operator to the incident.