Operator Feedback Correlation Using ML Performance Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern machine operator feedback systems fail to account for various factors influencing performance, leading to suboptimal operation in vehicles such as planes.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a processor, memory, and sensing devices to receive, classify, and generate feedback correlations through a machine learning model, providing insights to users via a display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional feedback systems are used, then the system structure remains simple, but the feedback accuracy and comprehensiveness deteriorate due to unaccounted performance factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A machine learning model is introduced as an intermediary component between the sensing device and the feedback output. This mediator processes raw performance data through classification and correlation analysis to generate comprehensive feedback, resolving the contradiction by adding intelligence without proportionally increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw performance parameters into classified performance categories through the machine learning model. By changing the representation and organization of parameters through classification and correlation analysis, the system achieves more accurate feedback while managing complexity through data transformation rather than adding complex hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If more performance factors are considered, then the feedback comprehensiveness improves, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback comprehensivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary classification of performance data into categories before generating feedback correlations. This pre-processing step organizes complex performance factors into manageable groups, enabling comprehensive feedback generation without proportional increases in processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where performance data is continuously processed through the machine learning model to generate correlations and feedback. This iterative feedback mechanism efficiently handles multiple performance factors by learning from and adapting to patterns in the data, reducing processing time through intelligent pattern recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260099769A1Apparatus for machine operatormachine operator feedback correlation
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 GMECI LLC
  • US20260099769A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099769A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099769A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an aspect, an apparatus for machine operator feedback correlation is presented. An apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. A memory contains instructions configuring at least a processor to receive, through a sensing device, performance data of at least a machine operator. At least a processor is configured to classify performance data to a performance category through a performance classifier. At least a processor is configured to calculate a performance determination. At least a processor is configured to generate a feedback correlation through a machine operator feedback correlation machine learning model. At least a processor is configured to provide a feedback correlation to a user through a display device.