Operator Network Event Detection for Material Process Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for identifying events in material processing or production processes using multi-dimensional data streams struggle with accurate discrimination and require complex adaptation to specific processes, leading to incorrect rejection or acceptance of components.

Innovation Solution

A measuring device with an operator network that allows flexible adaptation via a graphical user interface, incorporating decision and pattern operators to analyze high-frequency data streams, enabling precise identification of events and noise filtration, and providing a decision-making capability for determining component quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple pattern recognition is used for event identification, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision and discrimination accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition complexityVSAvoidevent identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into multiple sequential steps: initial pattern recognition to identify potential events, followed by detailed analysis of specific characteristics (frequency, energy, temporal patterns), and finally discrimination between different event types. This multi-stage segmentation allows simple initial filtering while achieving high precision through progressive refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional pattern matching (time-frequency) to three-dimensional evaluation by adding the energy dimension. Events are characterized not only by their temporal and spectral properties but also by their energy distribution across frequency bands, enabling more accurate discrimination between similar events and reducing false identifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive pattern databases are created for different processes, then the adaptability to specific processes is improved, but the device complexity and adaptation effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess adaptabilityVSAvoidadaptation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal evaluation criteria and characteristic parameters that can be applied across different material processing processes (machining, injection molding, forming, welding, etc.). Rather than creating entirely process-specific evaluation models, the same core evaluation framework is used with adjustable thresholds and weightings, enabling one system to serve multiple processes without proportional increases in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts to different processes by adjusting evaluation parameters such as frequency ranges, energy thresholds, and temporal window sizes rather than changing the fundamental evaluation logic. This parameter-based adaptation allows comprehensive process coverage while maintaining a consistent, manageable system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple patterns with similar agreement levels are identified, then the coverage of different event types is improved, but the reliability of event classification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent type coverageVSAvoidclassification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where initial pattern matching results are evaluated against multiple criteria (frequency match, energy distribution, temporal characteristics). When multiple patterns show similar agreement levels, the system uses feedback from additional characteristic analysis to discriminate between them, continuously refining the classification until a reliable determination is made or uncertainty is quantified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than relying on a single pattern match threshold, the system performs excessive analysis by evaluating multiple characteristics and patterns simultaneously. Even when one pattern shows strong agreement, the system continues to evaluate other potential patterns and characteristics to ensure no significant event type is missed, accepting some redundant computation to maintain high classification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11931842B2Methods, (measuring) devices, and components thereof, for identifying events in a material-processing or material production process using event patterns
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 QASS GMBH
  • US11931842B2 patent drawing
  • US11931842B2 patent drawing
  • US11931842B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A measuring device comprising a sensor for the high frequency detection of a measurement variable, such as sound, structure-borne noise, current, voltage, optical or magnetic measurement values and the like, with an operator network comprising at least one operator. An operator network that includes a notification operator, a machine control operator and/or a difference operator. The devices can be configured to identify events in a material-processing and/or material production process on the basis of a multidimensional data stream obtained during the process and having temporally resolved frequency and energy information, and to the use of defect patterns and/or event patterns and/or energy data, the data being supplied to a pattern operator or multiple pattern operators arranged in parallel or one after the other.