Operator Performance Measurement via Sensory and Physical Activity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to objectively and quantitatively assess a person's ability to perform tasks, as they only consider processing time without accounting for the actual skills and processes involved, making it difficult to improve or maintain productivity and efficiency in production lines or other task-based settings.

Innovation Solution

A performance measurement device that uses sensors to acquire data on sensory and physical activities of a target operator, calculating a performance index to objectively quantify their ability in executing tasks, allowing for identification of strengths and weaknesses and optimization of task performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If processing time is used as the only measure of ability, then objective and quantitative assessment of task completion is achieved, but information on the person's actual process and skills is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidprocess information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the task execution process into multiple measurable dimensions including sensory activity (vision, hearing, touch) and physical activity (movements, actions). By dividing the overall task performance into these distinct components, the system captures detailed process information while maintaining objective measurement through standardized sensing metrics for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional measurement (processing time only) to multi-dimensional measurement by incorporating sensory activity data and physical activity data. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous capture of both the outcome (task completion time) and the process (sensory and physical actions taken), resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If only processing time is measured, then simple and easy measurement is achieved, but the ability to objectively assess skills and provide repeatable improvement techniques is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement simplicityVSAvoidassessment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where sensing data from multiple sources (sensory and physical sensors) is continuously collected and analyzed to provide comprehensive performance evaluation. This feedback loop enables reliable skill assessment by comparing actual performance across multiple dimensions against standards, while maintaining operational simplicity through automated data collection and analysis systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensing data as an intermediary between the operator's actions and the assessment system. Multiple sensors act as intermediaries that objectively capture sensory and physical activity, translating complex human skills into measurable data that can be reliably analyzed and used for consistent evaluation and improvement guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If processing time is the sole performance metric, then quick assessment is achieved, but systematic improvement of productivity and efficiency becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment timeVSAvoidproductivity improvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by continuously collecting and analyzing sensing data during task execution rather than conducting separate detailed assessments. The system proactively gathers sensory and physical activity information in real-time, enabling immediate identification of improvement opportunities and systematic productivity enhancement without adding assessment time to the workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by integrating performance measurement directly into the task execution process. Sensors continuously monitor sensory and physical activities throughout task performance, ensuring that measurement and improvement activities occur continuously alongside productive work rather than interrupting the workflow, thus enabling systematic productivity improvement over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3617965A1Performance measurement device, performance measurement method and performance measurement program
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 OMRON CORP
  • EP3617965A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3617965A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3617965A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A performance measurement device (1) is provided with a data acquisition unit (111) configured to acquire sensing data (121) obtained from one or a plurality of sensors (30; 31) configured to measure an activity relating to at least one of sensory activity and physical activity of a target operator (50; 51) while said target operator (50; 51) executes a task (40), said task (40) including a plurality of basic operations; an index calculating unit (112) configured to analyze the sensing data (121) acquired to thereby calculate a performance index from the sensing data (121), the performance index indicating a degree of performance for the basic operations achieved through said activity; and a storage processor (113) configured to store the target operator (50; 51), the task (40), and the performance index calculated for each of the basic operations in association in a predetermined storage area (70).