Ophthalmic Lens Difference Determination Using Stimulus Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is challenging for visual health professionals and wearers to determine if personalized ophthalmic lenses are sufficiently different from non-personalized lenses, as existing methods lack a simple technique to assess the perceptible differences, and measurement inaccuracies can lead to varying results.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determine the level of difference between ophthalmic lenses using comparison parameters, which involve acquiring and processing design and definition parameters to associate them with a stimulus space, allowing users to discern differences based on sensory thresholds, and adjusting for individual sensitivity and measurement inaccuracies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If ophthalmic lenses are customized based on measurement of design parameters, then the lenses can be personalized to wearer needs, but measurement errors cause inconsistent results between successive measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens personalizationVSAvoidmeasurement consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to the practitioner about the level of difference between lenses determined from successive measurements. By calculating and displaying comparison parameters that indicate whether differences exceed perception thresholds, the system enables practitioners to identify when measurement variations are significant, allowing them to take corrective actions such as remeasuring or adjusting the determination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms design parameters into comparison parameters that are scaled to perceptual thresholds. By changing the parameter representation from raw measurement values to normalized comparison values that account for human perception limits, the system distinguishes between meaningful variations and measurement noise, resolving the inconsistency problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional optical performance methods are used to compare lenses, then optical properties can be analyzed, but the methods are complex and do not provide simple determination of perceptible differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical analysis accuracyVSAvoidcomparison method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential comparison parameters from full optical analysis that are relevant to human perception. Instead of analyzing all optical properties, it focuses on specific parameters (such as magnification, distortion, or other vision-critical properties) and compares them against perception thresholds, simplifying the complex optical analysis into actionable comparison results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system visualizes comparison results using color-coded indicators that immediately show whether differences exceed perception thresholds. By translating complex numerical comparisons into intuitive visual signals (such as color gradients or threshold indicators), the system provides simple determination of perceptible differences while maintaining reliable optical analysis in the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed comparison parameters are calculated to assess lens differences, then perceptible differences can be determined, but the system requires complex processing of design and definition parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifference detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores the relationship between design parameters, definition parameters, and comparison parameters in lookup tables or pre-computed models. When comparing lenses, it retrieves pre-established threshold values and comparison rules rather than performing complex real-time calculations, reducing processing complexity while maintaining precise difference detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3244255B1Means for determining the level difference between a first ophthalmic lens and an ophthalmic reference
Publication Date: 2024.12.04 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • EP3244255B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3244255B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3244255B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for assisting in determining the level of difference between a first ophthalmic lens and an ophthalmic reference characterized by one or more comparison parameters, by associating the ophthalmic lens and the ophthalmic reference with a point in a stimulus space, by calculating a distance between the comparison parameters of the first ophthalmic lens, the association depending on the user's ability to perceive the stimuli.