Non-Relational Database Oplog Backup With Parallel Queues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Backing up operation logs (oplogs) for non-relational databases is not scalable due to latency issues and potential data loss, especially when associating each oplog with its corresponding collection, which involves undesirable latencies and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing multiple queues and local disk memory to read oplogs into a multitenant queue in working memory, followed by local writer threads organizing them into collection-specific queues before transferring to remote storage, thereby reducing latency and avoiding data loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If oplogs are read directly from disk memory and transferred to remote storage, then the backup process is simple, but latency increases and data loss may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidbackup process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the oplog backup process into multiple independent stages: reading oplogs from disk, parsing and validating them, organizing into collection-specific queues, and transferring to remote storage. Each stage is handled by dedicated threads (reader threads, parser threads, writer threads), allowing parallel processing and reducing overall latency while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by reading and parsing oplogs into working memory queues before the actual backup transfer. The parser threads validate and organize oplog data in advance, ensuring it is ready for efficient transfer. This preliminary processing eliminates the need for sequential disk-read-to-remote-transfer operations, significantly reducing latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple queues and working memory are used to process oplogs, then latency is reduced and data loss is avoided, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata loss preventionVSAvoidqueue management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces working memory queues as intermediary structures between the disk-based oplog storage and the remote storage destination. These queues act as buffers that decouple the reading process from the transfer process, ensuring reliable data flow. The multitenant queue and collection-specific queues serve as intermediaries that organize and manage oplog data systematically, preventing data loss through structured buffering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The multitenant queue serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a buffer for oplog data, an organization structure for different collections, and a coordination mechanism between reader threads and writer threads. This multi-functional design reduces the need for separate specialized structures, managing complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If oplogs are transferred to remote storage sequentially, then network connections are not overwhelmed, but backup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup speedVSAvoidtransfer time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parallel transfer where multiple writer threads can simultaneously transfer oplogs to remote storage based on available network capacity and collection-specific requirements. The system dynamically adjusts the number and priority of active transfer threads, allowing high-speed parallel transfers when network resources are available while preventing overwhelming of network connections through controlled threading

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential single-threaded transfer to multi-dimensional parallel processing by introducing multiple writer threads that operate simultaneously on different collections. This dimensional expansion from 1D (sequential) to ND (parallel) processing significantly increases backup throughput while network connection management handles the complexity through structured concurrency control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250307082A1Backup management of operation logs for non-relational databases
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 RUBRIK INC
  • US20250307082A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307082A1 patent drawing
  • US20250307082A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for data management are described. For example, techniques for scalable backup solutions for non-relational databases are described. Operation logs (oplogs) may capture changes that occur at a non-relational database. A data management system (DMS) may use multiple queues and local disk memory of the host of the non-relational database to streamline the movement of oplogs from the non-relational database to a remote storage environment accessible to the DMS. Oplogs may be parsed into a multitenant queue, moved from the multitenant queue to collection-specific queues, written from the collection-specific queues to local disk memory of the host, and moved from the local disk memory of the host to the remote storage environment. Oplogs from multiple collections may be moved from the collection-specific queues to local disk memory of the host and from the local disk memory to the remote storage environment in parallel, reducing latency.