OPM Sensor Fastening System with Wedging Lock

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for fastening optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) sensors to MEG devices, such as helmets, fail to adequately limit sensor movement, leading to interference and reduced precision in magnetic field measurements due to signal noise and bias in brain region localization.

Innovation Solution

A fastening system comprising a support socket and a locking piece, made of flexible blades and polyamide materials, which securely positions and locks OPM sensors on a silicone matrix-covered helmet, minimizing movement and signal interference, with adjustable laces for a snug fit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If OPM sensors are positioned as close as possible to the patient's scalp to optimize signal-to-noise ratio, then measurement precision is improved, but sensor movement relative to the head increases causing interference and bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidsensor stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system is divided into multiple functional components: a support socket with flexible blades for positioning, a locking piece with wedging action for stabilization, and a removable barrier for sensor insertion. This segmentation allows each component to address specific aspects of sensor fixation, achieving both close positioning and movement prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support socket with flexible blades is designed to preliminarily position and hold the sensor in the correct location before the locking piece is engaged. This preliminary positioning ensures the sensor is correctly placed close to the scalp, and then the locking piece prevents any subsequent movement, resolving the contradiction between close positioning and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If rigid helmet systems are used to secure sensors, then sensor positioning stability is improved, but adaptability to various head sizes and shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor positioning stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to head sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support socket incorporates flexible blades that can bend and adapt to different head contours and sizes while maintaining firm contact with the sensor. This flexibility allows the same fastening system to be used across various head geometries, resolving the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The fastening system transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic system where the flexible blades can adjust their configuration based on the specific head shape and size. The blades flex during sensor insertion and then maintain a stable locked position, providing both adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If sensors are physically independent and positioned close to the scalp, then signal quality is improved, but ease of manufacture and assembly deteriorates due to complex fastening requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible blades in the support socket automatically adjust and lock into position when the sensor is inserted, eliminating the need for complex manual adjustment mechanisms. The removable barrier provides a simple snap-in operation, making assembly straightforward while maintaining precise sensor positioning close to the scalp.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The support socket acts as an intermediary component between the rigid locking piece and the sensor. It provides a simple interface for sensor insertion while the locking piece provides the securing function, dividing the complex fastening task into two simple operations that are easy to manufacture and assemble.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides reliable, customized positioning and locking of OPM sensors, reducing signal noise and improving measurement precision by minimizing sensor movement and allowing for flexible, customizable fit to various head sizes and shapes.

Implementation Method 1

the locking piece being designed to collaborate by force fitting with the support socket so as to immobilize the OPM sensor in a longitudinal position relative to the socket by wedging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce fitting: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the locking piece being designed to collaborate by force fitting with the support socket so as to immobilize the OPM sensor in a longitudinal position relative to the socket by wedging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedging: Wedge

Implementation Method 3

a group of flexible blades defining the housing and extending longitudinally from the base, the flexible blades each comprising a flexible lateral discontinuity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20240122515A1System for fastening optically pumped magnetometers (OPM), and elastomer matrix which incorporates a system part intended to be fixed to a magnetoencephalography device
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • US20240122515A1 patent drawing
  • US20240122515A1 patent drawing
  • US20240122515A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An OPM sensor fastening system includes a support socket for positioning the sensor, the support socket having a base and a housing for accommodating a portion of the OPM sensor, and a locking part for locking the sensor in the support socket, the locking part having an open base suitable for accommodating the base of the socket, a housing for accommodating a portion of the OPM sensor, and a removable partition suitable for letting the OPM sensor pass. The locking part is configured to press-fittingly cooperate with the support socket so as to blockingly wedge the OPM sensor in the longitudinal position relative to the socket.